Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0394(COD) · In Force

Union certification framework for carbon removals

370 submissions from 313 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 441 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 370 from organizations. Not shown: 67 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 4 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee ENVIRapporteur Lídia Pereira (EPP)
  1. Scrutiny period extended: Carbon farming methodologies · 2 Sept 2026
  2. Delegated act adopted: Carbon farming methodologies · 8 Jul 2026
  3. Delegated act adopted: Carbon farming methodologies · 21 Jan 2026
  4. Published in the Official Journal · 6 Dec 2024
  5. Signed · 27 Nov 2024

Who showed up

239 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 84 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.8 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 239Civil society 84Public authorities, academia, other 45

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice. An identical text filed by several organizations counts once: 2 submissions here repeat 2 texts word for word and are folded into them.

What the room declares

137 of 313
in the EU Register
690
full-time lobbying staff
€78.5M+
declared costs a year
439
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 23 Mar 2023 — it ran from 1 Dec 2022.

Policy area
Climate (DG CLIMA)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2022)672

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment2 May 2022
  2. Public consultation2 May 2022
  3. Proposal for a regulation23 Mar 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 370 submissions.

NF

NOAH - Friends of the Earth Denmark

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

The Proposal presents the overall goal of staying below a global average temperature increase of 1.5 o C, which must be achieved using, on the one hand, efficiencies, circular economy and renewable energy, and on the other hand, by recirculating carbon from burning waste, biomass and from direct CO2 capture from the atmosphere (DAC), where the captured carbon can be recycled into products and into synthetic fuels.

LinkedInX
V

Verra

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Verra welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission's EU carbon removal certification framework proposal. Carbon removals will form a crucial element in EU and global climate action and the achievement of net zero emissions. The proposed framework is critical in establishing a regulatory underpinning for implementing and measuring removals.

LinkedInX
IE

International Emissions Trading Association (IETA)

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes an opportunity to provide feedback on Commission proposal for EU Carbon Removals Certification Framework (CRCF). The CRCF proposal is a first steps towards EU policy on carbon removals, albeit it is lacking details on the actual use of carbon removals. Under the recent review the EU ETS the cap will reach 0 by 2039.

LinkedInX
CD

Confédération Européenne de la Production de Maïs (C.E.P.M)

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

23 mars 2023 Contribution à la consultation sur le projet de cadre de certification des retraits de carbone La CEPM, Confédération Européenne de la Production de maïs, souhaite faire les commentaires suivants sur le projet de cadre de certification des retraits de carbone (CFCR) : La CEPM considère que l’agriculture est une solution pour le climat qui doit être mobilisée à la fois sur les leviers de réduction…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
AG

Association Générale des Producteurs de Maïs - AGPM

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The General Sociation of Maïs Producers (AGPM) considers that the draft Framework for the Certification of Carbon Removal (CFCR) should take account in particular of the following points: to allow further development of the arable crops method Label Bas Carbone.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BA
PDF

We (BIO AUSTRIA, Association of Austrian organic farmers) would like to thank us for the opportunity to comment on the proposal for an EU framework for the certification of carbon removals/storage, and would like to see the following points taken into account: 1.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EF

European Federation of Energy Traders (EFET)

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Overall, we support the proposal. The development of a robust certification system across the EU is an indispensable first step in achieving a net contribution from carbon removals in support of the EU climate-neutrality objective. We also share the Commissions view that strong action to reduce emissions should not be undermined by shifting focus to carbon removals.

LinkedInX
CC

CNPF Centre national de la propriété forestière

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The CNPF (National Center for Forest Ownership) is a public body responsible for the development of forest management in private forests. From 2015 to 2018, with its partner I4CE (Institute for Climate Economics), the CNPF participated to the creation of the label Bas-Carbone (low-carbon label), the French standard for carbon offset projects.

LinkedInX
FD

Foro de Bosques y Cambio Climático

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The European Commission recognises carbon removal from the atmosphere as a crucial element in the fight against climate change and includes it in the climate law to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. From the Forests and Climate Change Forum we support this initiative in the process of creating a robust voluntary carbon removal market, based on existing systems, which could bring benefits to landowners, mainly for…

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
SS

Stiesdal SkyClean A/S

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The EU-CRCF has the potential to significantly contribute to delivering the reductions required for the EU and its member states to achieve their climate targets. By establishing clear and precise legislative frameworks, the EU-CRCF could create the framework required to unlock the potential of industrial and technology-based carbon removal.

LinkedInX
TI

TREEO I Fairventures Digital GmbH

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Stuttgart, 23.03.2023 Feedback on the Certification of carbon removals - EU rules About TREEO TREEO, a climate-tech startup in the Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) sector, serves and connects a two-sided market: tree growers (e.g. farmers) and balancers (our clients). The TREEO carbon product captures CO2 from our atmosphere through tree planting, and stores carbon in the long term in timber construction and biochar.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
LC

LIFE CarbonFarmingScheme -project

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

The LIFE CarbonFarmingScheme project (EU LIFE Preparatory project, LIFE19 PRE FI001-SI2.828588), implemented in 2020-2022 by a consortium lead by St1 Oy produced stakeholder-validated information and guidance on the governance and practical implementation of carbon farming measures and incentives in arable agriculture and forestry across different pedo-climatic regions in Europe.

Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EB

European Biochar Industry Consortium

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

In addition to emission avoidance and reduction, carbon removal remains the last chance to reach net zero within the timeframe envisaged by the EU. It is mandatory to compensate for hard-to-abate emissions and reduce the greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere to a level that preserves human habitats. The EU is leading the way by laying the groundwork for a carbon removal framework.

LinkedInX
FO

Friends of the Earth Germany/ BUND e.v.

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

The latest IPCC AR6 report that came out in March now made it very clear. We are far away from being on track to solving the accelerating climate crisis. Emissions need to go down as fast as possible. Climate finance need to increase to at least 3-6 times more. The era of fossil fuels and fossil fuels subsidies must end.

LinkedInX
AS

ASSOCIACIÓ SÈLVANS

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

From SÈLVANS we encourage the EU to facilitate the promotion of a certification of carbon removal (or a carbon credit) based on primary forest and old-growth forest structures (see definitions in Commission Guidelines for Defining, Mapping, Monitoring and Strictly Protecting EU Primary and Old-Growth Forests" from March 21st), given that such a model concentrates enormous advantages over other forest management…

LinkedInX
S

SBP

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

As identified in the Proposals, the experience from the development and implementation of the EU RED legislation had been taken into account in the development of this regulation. However, it is not evident this when considering the accreditation requirements propsoed in this regulation.

LinkedInX
M

Microsoft

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Microsoft’s comments on the European Commission’s proposal for a Carbon Removals Certification Framework (EU CRCF) March 2023 There is growing international recognition that meeting net zero by 2050 will first and foremost require dramatic changes in order to cut emissions, but also a significant amount of carbon removal.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
DN

Deutscher Naturschutzring (DNR)

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit an opinion on the Proposal for a Union certification framework for carbon removals (CRCF). Unfortunately, many important questions of the legislation are moved to the future, postponed to Delegated Acts or outsourced to a closed expert group.

LinkedInX
TC

TIC Council

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

TIC Council, the global association representing the independent testing, inspection, and certification (TIC) sector, views the Commissions initiative to establish the first EU-wide framework for the certification of carbon removals as a crucial step in achieving EU aims of reduced greenhouse gas emissions and climate neutrality by 2050.

LinkedInX
BE

BirdLife Europe and Central Asia

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

BirdLife welcomes this regulation which is a first attempt to create a financial system to enhance the carbon removals, although we consider that this should be done mainly by enhancing the natural ecosystems which are precious carbon sinks.

LinkedInX
CT

Cefic - The European Chemical Industry Council

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Cefic welcomes the Commissions initiative to develop a regulatory framework for the certification of carbon removals. Cefic hopes this initiative will pave the way for recognizing the contribution of technological solutions to carbon removals: the Commissions long-term strategy which underpins the EU Climate Law clearly emphasizes the role of industrial removals solutions for the achievement of the…

LinkedInX
AS

Airbus SAS

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Airbus comments on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removal In line with the IPCC special report on 1.5°C, IPCC AR6 and ATAG Waypoint 2050 on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, Airbus considers that carbon removals will be important…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
TP

TomatoEurope Processors Association

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

TO.23.01 TomatoEurope Position Paper on the proposal for a Regulation establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals The tomato processing sector is seriously committed to sustainability and decarbonization and continuously works to apply the best available techniques to improve its energy efficiency and reduce its carbon footprint.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
CO

Confederation of Norwegian enterprise

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

The Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed EU rules on the certification of carbon removals. We support the development of such a scheme and would like to offer some input considering the forthcoming legislative process.

LinkedInX
EI

European Insulation Manufacturers Association (Eurima)

· · filed 23 Mar 2023 · source

PDF

Response to the Commission proposal for a Certification of Carbon Removals Brussels, 23 March 2023 The European Insulation Manufacturers Association (Eurima) supports the development of ambitious policies fostering the achievement of a sustainable built environment based on significant emissions reduction targets for buildings and the broader construction ecosystem.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 370 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.