We strongly support the European Commissions initiative to carry out a comprehensive stress-test of the Nature Directives, and underline the importance of using this process as a genuine opportunity to address practical challenges and deliver meaningful simplification.
EPF
Estonian Private Forest Union
NGO · Estonia · EU Transparency Register 713554846552-05
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #334 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://www.cepf-eu.org/contact
- https://www.europeanlandowners.org/contactus
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Eesti Erametsaliit (EEML)
- Head office
- Tallinn, Estonia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Estonian in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Estonian Private Forest Union? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Estonian Private Forest Union filed 2 positions between 4 Jul 2024 and 7 May 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
2024 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
To support climate neutrality goals in LULUCF it is crucial to implement actions which have long term results. Increasing proportion of unmanaged forests can give a temporary positive effect but at some point old forests stop growing and mortality increases. In addition, regeneration is negligible and carbon emission is constant or exceeds carbon sequestration. Conversely, forest management supports LULUCF goals.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. · 2 files in common
- Deutscher Bauernverband e.V. · 2 files in common
- BirdLife Europe and Central Asia · 2 files in common
- The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) · 2 files in common
- Confederation of European Forest Owners · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 8.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Estonian Private Forest Union’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.