Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at Brazilian Tree Industry? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Brazilian Tree Industry filed 3 positions between 26 Aug 2025 and 17 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
1. CBAM should not be expanded for downstream goods without technical criterion. We recommend that the possible inclusion of downstream goods in the CBAM be preceded by specific analyses of Technical Capability of Quantification at non-EU origins ", respecting different development realities.
Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission
The submission argues that the European framework for international carbon credits should be aligned with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, ensuring regulatory predictability and avoiding excessive barriers that could limit the participation of developing countries.
The submission argues that the European framework for international carbon credits should be aligned with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, ensuring regulatory predictability and avoiding excessive barriers that could limit the participation of developing countries.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Brazilian Tree Industry’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.