RAG Austria welcomes the inclusion of hydrogen in the EU's climate strategy. Nevertheless, we see a need for improvements in the RED III draft in the following areas: • Technology openness: Ambitious targets can only be achieved in the short term if proven, efficient and economical technologies are allowed on an equal footing; • Imports: Europe will be dependent on secure supplies of green energy from third…
RAG Austria AG
Company · Austria · EU Transparency Register 130261351189-94
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #141 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Übersicht Mitgliedschaften RAG/RES
- 1)Österreich
- eFuel Alliance Austria
- FGW – Fachverband Gas Wärme
- FVEK – Fachverband der Energierohstoff- und Kraftstoffindustrie
- GTÖ – Verein für Geothermie Österreich
- IIA Austria – Institut für Interne Revision Österreich
- IV – Industriellenvereinigung Österreich
- HIAA – Hydrogen Import Alliance Austria
- HyPA – Hydrogen Partnership Austria
- ÖCI – Österreichisches Controller Institut
- ÖGEW – Österreichische Gesellschaft für Energiewissenschaften
- and 20 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- RAG Companies (RAG)
- Head office
- Vienna, Austria
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track RAG in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at RAG Austria AG? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
RAG Austria AG filed 10 positions between 17 Nov 2021 and 5 Dec 2025, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input to this consultation. Please find our detailed comments attached. Below we briefly outline the key points that are essential for the development and implementation of underground hydrogen storage, particularly in depleted gas reservoirs: 1) Ensure regulatory neutrality - Taxonomy eligibility must not depend on a RAB: Taxonomy criteria should not depend on inclusion in a…
Based on our extensive experience in different decarbonization projects, we would like to recommend in the CRM Act not only to consider rare earths and other metals, but also to define early enough other liquid and gaseous resources (in particular methane [CH4], hydrogen [H2], carbon dioxide [CO2] and solid carbon [C]) as critical raw materials and thus to derive and implement measures for their future supply.
Issues to be improved: 1) Use of adequate terminology: Overall, it is important to differentiate between carbon (C) & CO2-removal activities. These terms are frequently not adequately used. Especially as regards CCS, this is usually explained as carbon capture and sequestration (long-term storage), instead it should be explained as CO2 capture & sequestration to better describe the technological procedure.
RAG Austria AG welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Net Zero Industry Act. To contribute to the goals and rapid and cost-effective implementation of the NZIA, we call for the scope of strategic net-zero technologies to still be clarified: 1) Under point 3 "Battery/storage technologies" large-volume underground H2 storage should also be explicitly considered: In view of increasing shares of renewable…
RAG Austria AG welcomes the creation of appropriate framework conditions for the H2 market/infrastructure. Nevertheless, we see considerable need for improvement in the current draft of the gas package: • The role of large-volume seasonal storage is still undervalued and has regulatory gaps: In the ramp-up phase, there should be the possibility of so-called "regulatory sandboxes" similar to those for grids.
RAG Austria welcomes the opportunity to comment on the legislative proposals regarding AFIR/CO2 standards. However, there is need for improvement in the following topics: • Technology openness of the drafts not given: With the focus on e-mobility in the transport sector, the existing potentials regarding rapid CO2 savings through the use of gaseous energy sources are massively misjudged.
RAG Austria AG welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Electrification Action Plan (EAP). While the initiative represents an important step towards decarbonisation, its current approach places too much emphasis on electrification as the sole pathway.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
RAG Austria AG proposes the following suggestions for an effective methane Regulation: • A principle of proportionality should be considered. • One type of solution does not fit all cases along the gas supply chain. Flexibility is needed to prioritize actions and ensure cost-effectiveness.
RAG Austria AG welcomes the creation of appropriate framework conditions for the H2 market/infrastructure. Nevertheless, we see considerable need for improvement in the current draft of the gas package: • The role of large-volume seasonal storage is still undervalued and has regulatory gaps: In the ramp-up phase, there should be the possibility of so-called "regulatory sandboxes" similar to those for grids.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put RAG Austria AG next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 394.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from RAG Austria AG’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.