This response is limited in scope to the EU Taxonomy activity 4.5 Electricity generation from hydropower. Swedenergy welcomes the Commissions intention to simplify the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for hydropower and to better align them with the safeguards of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), as stated in recital 24.
Energiföretagen Sverige - Swedenergy
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 13073098010-57
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #516 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Member association of Eurelectric
- Euroheat and Power
- and GEODE.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Energiföretagen / Swedenergy
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Energiföretagen in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Energiföretagen Sverige - Swedenergy? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Energiföretagen Sverige - Swedenergy filed 3 positions between 7 Apr 2026 and 25 Aug 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
See attached position paper for Swedenergy´s comments. Summary of the position is below: Swedenergy fully supports EUs climate-neutrality target for 2050 and the new intermediate 2040 climate target of 90 percent net GHG emission reductions in line with the 1,5-degree target, set by the Paris Agreement.
Swedenergy supports the objective of RfG 2.0 to maintain system security and resilience, but the revised code must remain proportionate, predictable and based on clearly demonstrated system needs. Requirements should focus on capabilities that provide measurable benefits to system stability and should preserve long-term investment conditions for existing generation assets, including hydropower.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- VDMA · 3 files in common
- Eurelectric · 3 files in common
- Repsol · 3 files in common
- nucleareurope · 3 files in common
- COGEN Europe · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 81.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Energiföretagen Sverige - Swedenergy’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.