Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EEB

European Environmental Bureau

Environmental organization · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 06798511314-27

39
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
36
legislative files
of 326 tracked
28
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #1 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

51.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
31
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • · African Circular Economy Network
  • · ECEEE (European Council for an energy efficient economy)
  • · European Fossil Free Steel Network -
  • · CODEF
  • · BEUC (The European Consumer Organisation)
  • · Cool heating coalition (previous better without boilers)
  • · Build Ukraine Back Better platform
  • · BFFP (Break Free From Plastic)
  • · Buy Better to Build Better
  • · CAN Europe (Climate Action Network Europe)
  • · CASE (Coalition against SLAPPs in Europe)
  • · CASCA (Cap and Share Climate Alliance)
  • and 42 more

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
BRUSSELS, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at European Environmental Bureau? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files European Environmental Bureau engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 36 files, from European Environmental Bureau or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

European Environmental Bureau filed 39 positions between 21 Feb 2018 and 28 Aug 2026, across 36 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 28 times.

2018 · 3 filed2020 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 2 filed2024 · 6 filed2025 · 10 filed2026 · 16 filed

What they argued

Circular Economy Actfiled 5 Nov 2025PDFsource

Please find attached the EEB response to the public consultation and the call for evidence on the Circular Economy Act. A prosperous economy that works for people and planet can be achieved through a system embedded in circular principles: living well within planetary boundaries.

Acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors (Industrial Accelerator Act)filed 27 May 2026PDFsource

INDUSTRIAL ACCELERATOR ACT EEB RECOMMENDATIONS MAY 2026 The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) is the largest network of environmental citizens’ organisations in Europe. It unites 190 civil society organisations from 41 countries, working for a better future where people and nature thrive together.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Right to Stay Strategy: Your Region, Your Futurefiled 5 Jun 2026PDFsource

Please see attached the European Environmental Bureaus (EEB) feedback. The EEB's contribution sets out how the EUs Right to Stay Strategy can align with the renewable energy transition to strengthen rural resilience and territorial cohesion, towards ensuring that rural communities are primary beneficiaries and active participants in the renewable acceleration.

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)filed 31 Aug 2020PDFsource

The EEB welcomes the inception impact assessment for the initiative “Legislative proposal on substantiating green claims”. The EEB actively participates in the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), its Technical Advisory Board (TAB), as well as the pilot and transition phase projects. The EEB supports the need for standard methodologies to assess the impact on the environment of products on the European market.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresfiled 12 Aug 2025PDFsource

CBAM call for evidence – EEB position The CBAM review must recognise its role of climate measure intended to help meeting the EU climate neutrality goal and promote decarbonisation globally1, and that relevant and objective data2 is needed to support circumvention claims, which to date is very limited, given that CBAM is still in its transitional phase and many pieces of secondary legislation have not been defined…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Renewable energy legal framework post-2030filed 16 Apr 2026PDFsource

16 April 2026​ ​ European Environmental Bureau​ ​ Ref. Ares(2026)3961048 - 16/04/2026 The European Environmental Bureau have organised our response to this call for evidence around the following headings from the Call: ●​ ●​ ●​ ●​ accelerate investments into RES in a cost-effective manner; to strengthen the enabling framework to integrate RES into the electricity sector; to improve energy system integration and…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Single-use plastics and fishing gear rules - evaluationfiled 17 Mar 2026PDFsource

Please find attached the response from the Rethink Plastic Alliance to the call for evidence for the evaluation of the Single-Use Plastics Directive. The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) draws attention to this joint submission, which reflects the shared position of the alliance.

Simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden in the areas of batteries and industrial emissions reporting (Omnibus VIII on environmental legislation)filed 6 May 2026PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) welcomes the opportunity to give feedback regarding the Commission's proposal on "simplification of administrative burden in environmental legislation". Please find attached our detailed contribution, which includes a feedback on the methodology as well as concerns over the announced revision of the Water Framework Directive and the content of the proposal regarding the SCIP…

Affordable housing Actfiled 2 Apr 2026PDFsource

The EEB welcomes the initiative to provide a framework for local authorities to guide possible restrictions on STRs by clearly outlining which legal principles, rights and obligations are relevant in this context and establishing greater legal certainty. In line with the objective of increasing housing supply, we however strongly urge for the Commission to consider going beyond STRs in this framework.

European climate resilience and risk management lawfiled 4 Sept 2025PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop an integrated framework on Climate Resilience and Risk Management. The initiative comes at a critical time, as the EU faces escalating climate impacts that threaten ecosystems, societies, and economies alike.

EU rules for the calculation and reporting of recycled content in single-use plastic bottlesfiled 14 Aug 2025source

The European Environmental Bureau welcomes this opportunity to share feedback on the draft Implementing Decision laying down rules for the application of Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the calculation verification and reporting of data on recycled plastic content in single-use plastic beverage bottles.

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 30 Mar 2026PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the call for evidence regarding guidance on the application of the 'do no signifcant harm' principle under the 2028-2034 MFF. Please find attached our detailed contribution, which includes a feedback on the Commission's proposal for an EU Budget Performance Regulation, as well as input on the future Commission guidance.

Heating and cooling strategyfiled 7 Oct 2025PDFsource

We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the development of the EU Heating & Cooling (H&C) Strategy. The H&C Strategy must prioritise energy efficiency and non-polluting technologies. The phase out of fossil fuels should play a major role in the strategy.

Commission Directive amending Annex III of the Nitrates Directivefiled 17 May 2024PDFsource

The EEB would like to express its deep concern regarding the Commissions draft act for a Directive to amend Annex III of the Nitrates Directive. The proposal would allow the application of fertiliser products recovered from manure (up to 100 kg N per hectare and year) above the current legal threshold of 170 kg N per hectare and year set for livestock manure.

A water resilience research and innovation strategyfiled 24 Jul 2026PDFsource

The EEB welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Call for Evidence on the Water Resilience Research and Innovation (R&I) Strategy. This initiative should serve to support the implementation and achievement of the objectives of EU water legislation to protect and restore coastal and freshwater ecosystems, which are the foundations of Europes water resilience.

Accelerating digitalisation in the water sector for improved management and sustainabilityfiled 24 Jun 2026PDFsource

The EEB welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Call for Evidence on the digitalization of the water sector, which is one of the flagship actions of the Water Resilience Strategy. The EEB recommends to only promote those digital solutions where the potential benefits for water protection and resilience clearly outweigh the negative impacts stemming from digital infrastructure, such as data centres.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 7 Feb 2024PDFsource

Forests play a vital role for biodiversity and climate, yet there is a significant deficit in public information about their status, the impact of management practices and their ecological condition. It is concerning that information about the state of forests, and their trends towards destruction or restoration, is often scattered, incomparable, inaccessible, outdated or entirely missing.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 6 May 2022source

The EEB strongly welcomes the legislative initiative to propose a new EU Framework for Forest monitoring and Strategic Plans. Forests are crucial for biodiversity and climate, yet there is a lack of public information about their status, the impact of management practices, their ecological conditions or climate contributions.

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulationfiled 21 Mar 2025PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau, supported by the Zero Mercury Working Group, appreciates the opportunity to provide evidence on the evaluation of the Cosmetics Products Regulation (CPR). The CPR has played a crucial role in ensuring a high level of consumer safety, notably by keeping the most harmful substances out of cosmetics, becoming a reference at global level.

Rating scheme for data centres in Europefiled 23 Apr 2026source

The draft delegated regulation proposes to amend article 5, paragraph 5 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1364 of 14 March 2024. However, the proposed amendment does not address the general presumption of confidentiality made in the article which by default classifies the underlying information related to key performance indicators for individual data centers as commercially sensitive information in the…

European Chemicals Agency and amending regulationsfiled 2 Dec 2025PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau welcomes the Commissions proposal for the ECHA Basic Regulation to improve ECHA's governance and financial model as its mandate grows. We provide the following recommendations to further strengthen protection of people and nature from harmful chemicals.

Revision of EU rules on textile labellingfiled 28 Sept 2023PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) welcomes the Commissions initiative to evaluate the possibility of revising the Textile Labelling Regulation (TLR). The attached document contains considerations we urge policymakers to explore in the evaluation and impact assessment.

Sustainable products - disclosure of information on unsold consumer productsfiled 10 Jul 2025PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau welcomes this opportunity to share feedback on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 as regards the details and format for the disclosure of information on discarded unsold consumer products.

Ecodesign requirements for iron and steel productsfiled 10 Aug 2026source

1. Classes of performance and minimum environmental performance thresholds. We support the introduction of classes of performance and minimum environmental performance thresholds. To ensure a strong labelling mechanism and thresholds, robust datasets at installation level should be used.

Fitness check – energy security architecturefiled 26 Nov 2024PDFsource

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback and call on the European Commission to prioritise people and nature when revising the EU's energy security architecture, based on the following key principles: (1) LNG is just prolonging our fuel dependency neither Russia nor the US should be considered reliable partners.

Ship recycling – European list of ship recycling facilities (16th edition)filed 28 Aug 2026PDFsource

EEB welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the public consultation on the 16th European list of ship recycling facilities and would like to share its recommendations, more specifically on the proposed inclusion of two beaching recycling facilities, YSI Recyclers LLP and Shree Ram Vessel Scrap Pvt, located in Alang, India.

EU’s next long-term budget (MFF) – performance of the EU budgetfiled 7 Nov 2025PDFsource

The Commissions proposal for the MFF Performance Regulation is a welcome step forward. By introducing a single system for monitoring expenditures, the Regulation strengthens transparency while reducing administrative burdens with particular welcomed elements: - Commitment of the EU budget to climate and environment goals; - Application of the Do No Significant Harm principle, ensuring environmentally harmful…

Interim evaluation of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) within the 2021–2027 budgetfiled 2 Apr 2026source

As an environmental NGO, the EEB considers that the recent CAP changes appear as failing to properly address farmers concerns while weakening environmental safeguards. The simplification processes lacked transparency and were pushed through without sufficient consultation or evidence, resulting in a more uncertain and less effective framework overall.

Regulatory measure on the review of energy labelling for household washing machines and washer-driersfiled 21 Feb 2018source

The EEB/Coolproducts views on the Commission’s proposal are summarised in the attached paper: https://goo.gl/7XeaF8 We are in favour of Option 4 because Ecodesign & Energy Labelling requirements for household washing machines and washer driers help mitigate climate change, help EU citizens save on their bills, and we strongly support the Commission’s intention to better integrate domestic appliances in a Circular…

Review of ecodesign requirements for computers and computer serversfiled 21 Feb 2018source

The inception impact assessment document provides a very good introduction to the topic, and we are very supportive of most of the statements made. The best policy option for consumers and the environment is indeed option 3. We would like to insist on three key points: 1/ Ecodesign requirements should be pursued, but thoroughly revised and reinforced to better reflect current technologies and practices.

Energy labelling requirements for computers and computer serversfiled 21 Feb 2018source

The inception impact assessment document provides a very good introduction to the topic, and we are very supportive of most of the statements made. The best policy option for consumers and the environment is indeed option 3. We would like to insist on three key points: 1/ Ecodesign requirements should be pursued, but thoroughly revised and reinforced to better reflect current technologies and practices.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 832.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Environmental Bureau’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.