Vattenfall appreciates the opportunity to respond to the public consultation informing the public procurement legislation review. In our opinion, the current EU public procurement framework has provided a robust basis for standardisation, competition, and responsible business conduct.
Vattenfall AB
Company · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 12955024114-93
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #86 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Sectoral advocacy associations:
- EURELECTRIC (http://www.eurelectric.org/)
- EFET (http://www.efet.org/)
- IETA (http://www.ieta.org/)
- Euroheat & Power (http://www.euroheat.org/)
- Nucleareurope(https://www.nucleareurope.eu/)
- Wind Europe (https://windeurope.org/)
- SolarPower Europe (https://www.solarpowereurope.org/)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Vattenfall
- Head office
- Solna - Stockholm, Sweden
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Vattenfall in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Vattenfall AB? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Vattenfall AB filed 7 positions between 31 Aug 2020 and 25 Aug 2026, across 7 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
Vattenfall is committed to net zero and see the EU taxonomy as one tool that can and should support this transition (in 2024 Vattenfall had 88% aligned Capex) All fossil free energy sources play vital a role in the transition together with distribution, storage and flexibility solutions. The taxonomy should be as technology neutral as possible.
Vattenfall welcomes the EU Commission’s ambition to increase the quality and validation of environmentally green claims. There is a strong need to streamline and concretize claims on environmental performance. We firmly believe this leads to better grounds for decision-making, both in terms of end-customer consumption and in terms of addressing environmental impact throughout the product lifecycle.
1. Downstream Scope Extension Should CBAM apply to more products? What would the impact be? While we recognize that the proposed extension may contribute to a more level playing field and support efforts to reduce CO emissions, it appears to be primarily targeted at steel and metals. In the context of offshore wind, the most significant impact would concern foundation structures.
Vattenfall welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft proposal: 1) Vattenfall welcomes the overall direction of RfG 2.0 and its ambition to support a more resilient electricity system through a harmonised and future-oriented connection framework. 2) Our primary concern relates to the treatment of existing assets (Art. 4 par. 3 as well as Art. 45).
Vattenfall is a leading European energy company with 12 million customers and 21,000 employees. Were convinced theres a way to build a future where everyone can choose fossil free ways to move, make and live. In the context of the datacentre labelling framework under the Energy Efficiency Directive, we believe the focus should be on clear, comparable and practical disclosure, rather than on imposing strict technical…
The issue I find within e-invoicing today is when working with many companies in different countries are not the formats themselves but the medium in which they are sent. For example with it being allowed for an XML-file sent by e-mail in Germany which requires an additional way of extracting information than regular e-invoices (between VAN-operators).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ECOS · 5 files in common
- ACEA · 5 files in common
- Cefic · 4 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 4 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 176.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Vattenfall AB’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.