Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FWV

Forests of the World (Verdens Skove)

NGO · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 28526077094-54

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1068 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #585 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • ECCJ (European Coalition for Corporate Justice)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Danish 92 Group - Forum for Sustainable Development
Head office
København, Denmark

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Forests in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Forests of the World (Verdens Skove)? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Forests of the World (Verdens Skove) engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Forests of the World (Verdens Skove) or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Forests of the World (Verdens Skove) filed 2 positions between 5 May 2022 and 20 Mar 2023, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed

What they argued

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 20 Mar 2023source

In general, we believe that this proposal should be rejected if not strongly strengthened, as: The proposal has too many shortcomings and a potential risk of carbon storage and removals standing in place of reductions, which is deeply worrying. Reductions in carbon emissions cannot be equated with carbon removals and storage. BECCS based on wood-based biomass should not be certified.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 5 May 2022PDFsource

Feedback on: New EU Framework for Forest Monitoring and Strategic Plans Forests of the World - an international nonprofit forest conservation organization established in 1983 and headquartered in Denmark - welcomes a New EU Framework for Forest Monitoring and Strategic Plans.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Forests of the World (Verdens Skove) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 30.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Forests of the World (Verdens Skove)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.