Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FR

Finnwatch ry

NGO · Finland · EU Transparency Register 076979218638-77

5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #123 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Finnwatch on jäsenenä seuraavissa verkostoissa:
  • European Coalition for Corporate Justice (www.corporatejustice.org)
  • Climate Action Network Europe (www.caneurope.org)
  • Tax Justice Europe (www.globaltaxjustice.org)
  • Vastuullinen lahjoittaminen ry (www.vala.fi)
  • Hyvinvointiala Hali ry (www.hyvinvointiala.fi)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Helsinki, Finland

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Finnwatch in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Finnwatch ry? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Finnwatch ry engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 5 files, from Finnwatch ry or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Finnwatch ry filed 5 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 30 Mar 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 3 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 7 Mar 2025source

It is clear that the current public procurement directive is not fit to scale business respect for human rights and the environment. As such, we support the review of public procurement directives as there is a pressing need for a transition to sustainable business models.

Revision of EU rules on public procurementfiled 26 Jan 2026PDFsource

Finnwatch welcomes the revision of public procurement directives and this opportunity to provide feedback for it. The EU has in recent years introduced new sustainability rules for companies, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which introduce sustainability due diligence obligations and related reporting duties for in-scope companies.

Simplification of the Union framework on direct taxationfiled 30 Mar 2026PDFsource

The EU Commission's calls for simplification of the tax system are reasonable, given the administrative burden of navigating 27 distinct national tax systems. However, it is important to consider carefully revisions to directives such as ATAD in order not to undermine their policy objectives. Many proposals framed as simplifications risk creating more space for profit shifting and aggressive tax planning.

Amending certain Regulations as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures (Omnibus IV)filed 8 Jul 2025source

In its response, Finnwatch is focusing only on the proposed changes to the battery due diligence obligations. Finnwatch does not support the Commission's proposal to reduce the scope of the application of certain due diligence obligations in the batteries regulation by extending the exclusion clause that currently applies to companies with less than 40 million euros turnover to companies with less than 150 million…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 169.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Finnwatch ry’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.