It is clear that the current public procurement directive is not fit to scale business respect for human rights and the environment. As such, we support the review of public procurement directives as there is a pressing need for a transition to sustainable business models.
Finnwatch ry
NGO · Finland · EU Transparency Register 076979218638-77
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #123 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Finnwatch on jäsenenä seuraavissa verkostoissa:
- European Coalition for Corporate Justice (www.corporatejustice.org)
- Climate Action Network Europe (www.caneurope.org)
- Tax Justice Europe (www.globaltaxjustice.org)
- Vastuullinen lahjoittaminen ry (www.vala.fi)
- Hyvinvointiala Hali ry (www.hyvinvointiala.fi)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Helsinki, Finland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Finnwatch in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Finnwatch ry? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Finnwatch ry filed 5 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 30 Mar 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Finnwatch welcomes the revision of public procurement directives and this opportunity to provide feedback for it. The EU has in recent years introduced new sustainability rules for companies, such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which introduce sustainability due diligence obligations and related reporting duties for in-scope companies.
Finnwatch welcomes the initiative to expand the scope of the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) to downstream products and encourages the commission to also consider expansion to new products groups. The mechanism has multiple overlapping benefits for the goals of climate policy.
The EU Commission's calls for simplification of the tax system are reasonable, given the administrative burden of navigating 27 distinct national tax systems. However, it is important to consider carefully revisions to directives such as ATAD in order not to undermine their policy objectives. Many proposals framed as simplifications risk creating more space for profit shifting and aggressive tax planning.
In its response, Finnwatch is focusing only on the proposed changes to the battery due diligence obligations. Finnwatch does not support the Commission's proposal to reduce the scope of the application of certain due diligence obligations in the batteries regulation by extending the exclusion clause that currently applies to companies with less than 40 million euros turnover to companies with less than 150 million…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EDF - Electricité de France · 4 files in common
- Cefic · 3 files in common
- SMEunited · 3 files in common
- VDMA · 3 files in common
- MedTech Europe · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 169.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Finnwatch ry’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.