The initiative to create a legal act establishing EU-wide rules on a business wallet is very welcome. We see great potential for digitalisation, automation, and cost reduction in B2G- and especially B2B-processes, which have so far been underutilised. However, it must be emphasised that technical automation alone is not enough to reduce bureaucracy.
BUN
Bundesdruckerei
Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 197184824639-83
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #237 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://www.bundesdruckerei.de/de/konzern/gremienarbeit
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Bundesdruckerei GmbH
- Head office
- Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Bundesdruckerei in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Bundesdruckerei? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Bundesdruckerei filed 4 positions between 13 May 2025 and 30 Sept 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
The Bundesdruckerei (a German federal technology company), which is actively engaged in the development of European Data Spaces, welcomes the European Commission's initiative to introduce a European Business Wallet (EUBW). We consider the EUBW a key enabler of a trustworthy, interoperable, and sovereign digital economy in Europe.
In general, it should be noted that additional requirements that deviate from the referenced standards should be viewed critically because they interfere with professional discussions and autonomy. Technical standards are written and approved by a large group of experts after thorough discussions and scrutinization.
- In general: Harmonized regulations regarding liability coverage according to Art 24 Abs. 2 lit. c) eIDAS should be integrated into this Implementing Regulation, in particular through liability insurance. Currently, there is still a great deal of fragmentation in the supervisory practices of the member states in this field. Harmonization through uniform requirements is absolutely essential. - Art 1 Nr.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- European Banking Federation · 3 files in common
- Assocertificatori · 3 files in common
- Bitkom e.V. · 2 files in common
- DigitalTrade4.EU · 2 files in common
- Association of German Banks · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 10.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Bundesdruckerei’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.