International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes an opportunity to provide feedback on Commission proposal for EU Carbon Removals Certification Framework (CRCF). The CRCF proposal is a first steps towards EU policy on carbon removals, albeit it is lacking details on the actual use of carbon removals. Under the recent review the EU ETS the cap will reach 0 by 2039.
IETA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 7157999502-14
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #355 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- IETA has formed several partnerships including
- among others
- the World Bank
- the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)
- the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
- the International Energy Agency (IEA) and ICAP.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- International Emissions Trading Association (IETA)
- Head office
- Genève, Switzerland
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track IETA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at IETA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
IETA filed 11 positions between 26 Aug 2020 and 5 Aug 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 10 times.
What they argued
The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the Commission's consultation on the revision of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and the Market Stability Reserve (MSR). Carbon trading is the most effective and economically efficient tool for advancing climate ambition.
1 Ref. Ares(2025)7944319 - 22/09/2025 16 September 2025 IETA Feedback to European Commission Public Consultation - Climate Law Review The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes the European Commission’s proposal to establish the EU 2040 climate target and to review the Climate Law.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
IETA welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft Implementing Act on the carbon price paid in third countries under CBAM. IETA's response focuses on the need for timely implementation guidance, including on default carbon price values, the treatment of credits used under third-country compliance systems, and reporting and verification requirements.
IETA welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the CBAM implementing act on carbon price paid in a third country. IETA reiterates its strong support for the EUs climate objectives and acknowledges an effective CBAM as a tool to address carbon leakage while incentivising global carbon pricing.
The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions consultation on the role of international carbon credits in the EUs 2040 climate policy framework.
The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the Commissions Call for Evidence regarding the adjustment of CBAM obligations to account for the free allocation of EU ETS allowances.
As a global business organisation representing leading actors in the EU and international carbon markets, IETA welcomes the European Commissions efforts to explore how national targets can drive climate action, including the role of flexibilities and EUlevel enabling measures. Please see the full response attached.
The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) welcomes the opportunity to provide evidence to support the Commissions review of the LULUCF Regulation. IETA believes this evaluation of the LULUCF rules is an important opportunity to consider how the EU policy toolkit can enhance activity and ambition.
IETA welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft Delegated Regulation on the sale and repurchase of CBAM certificates. Our response focuses on practical implementation issues, including delegated execution and group-level operational support, the repurchase process and limits, transaction fees, and areas where further clarification would improve certainty and workability for authorised CBAM declarants.
IETA welcomes the opportunity to provide initial feedback on this important topic. Like many organisations, IETA is keen to take the time necessary to study this complex issue in full. Here we pose preliminary comments that we believe should be considered when coming to a decision about Aviation. A more formal position will be made clear in the full public consultation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put IETA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 293.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from IETA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.