This a feedback from an interdisciplinary group of the University of Bologna (our view does not reflect the official view of our Alma Mater). We argue and conclude that comprehensive rules on the certification of each type of carbon removal are necessary and that validation of projects and the subsequent verification of carbon removals achieved, should be carried out preferably by by public authorities, possibly as…
UB
Università di Bologna
Academic / research · Italy · EU Transparency Register 096124310820-70
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 55 academic institutions on this site, they rank #27 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2013
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://www.unibo.it/en/research/international-networks-and-associations
- https://www.unibo.it/en/university/international-outreach/international-outreach
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Academic institutions
- Registered as
- Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna (UNIBO)
- Head office
- Bologna, Italy
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Università in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Università di Bologna? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Università di Bologna filed 3 positions between 28 Apr 2022 and 30 Apr 2024, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2022 · 2 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
Call for Evidence for an impact assessment Contribution from a group of researchers of the University of Bologna, April 2022 The call for evidence is asking if 1. An EU certification framework should set common minimum standards for the certification methodologies, including monitoring, reporting and verification, or provide for comprehensive rules on the certification of each type of carbon removal. 2.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Prof. [name removed] & Astronomy Dept. University of Bologna [email removed] 30 April 2024 Subject: Consultation Response on White Paper 'On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential' To Whom It May Concern: I am writing my feedback to the White Paper "On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Università di Bologna next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Università di Bologna’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.