NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 75365248559-90
7
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 326 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #63 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
9
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since
Declares membership of
Carbon Market Watch is an accredited observer of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
We are also a member of:
Climate Action Network (CAN)
European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
International Coalition for Sustainable Aviation (ICSA)
Clean Shipping Coalition (CSC)
Break Free From Plastics Coalition (BFFP)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Carbon Market Watch? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Carbon Market Watch filed 7 positions between 20 Jul 2023 and 10 Jun 2026, across 7 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
Green Claims Directive: Open Consultation Carbon Market Watch’s response to the Green Claims Directive public consultation Introduction Carbon Market Watch welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Green Claims Directive (GCD).1 Misleading and unsubstantiated green claims are widespread and must be addressed.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The regular update of the benchmarks values for free allowances under the EU ETS is a necessary step to ensure that the last years of the free allocation system are fully coherent with the aim of a full phase-out by 2034 for all sectors, and provide the investment signals necessary to funnel funding into industrial decarbonisation.
Carbon Market Watch is concerned with the willingness of the European Commission to allow for domestic and international credits to account as carbon price paid in a third country. Not only this represents a discrepancy with the current EU ETS architecture, but sets a dangerous precedent that incentivises the establishment of crediting schemes with no qualitative safeguards. Our feedback is in the document attached.
Note: the following response is to be read together with the accompanying PDF that was attached, which contains sources and citations and develops our position in more detail. When carrying out its impact assessment, the Commission should consider that any option allowing the EU to rely on international credits to facilitate the achievement of its 2040 climate target is problematic for the following reasons: 1.
Carbon Market Watchs response focuses on the role of carbon dioxide removals planning and reporting within the Governance Regulation framework. Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDR) are measures and technologies that draw down carbon from the atmosphere and store it over relevant time horizons, so the removed CO2 can no longer contribute to climate breakdown.
When designing the post-2030 package, the European Commission must keep the long-term trajectory towards net-zero by 2050 at the latest and net-negativity thereafter in sight. Maintaining legally binding targets and robust progress reporting is necessary to ensure contributions by each member state.
There is no way around it: the EU LULUCF carbon sink is shrinking. The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change (ESABCC) confirmed that the EU net sink has been declining rapidly over the last 10 years, decreasing by 2021 to a third of its 2005 total (ESABCC, 2024).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Carbon Market Watch’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.