Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CMW

Carbon Market Watch

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 75365248559-90

7
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 326 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #63 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
9
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Carbon Market Watch is an accredited observer of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
  • We are also a member of:
  • Climate Action Network (CAN)
  • European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
  • International Coalition for Sustainable Aviation (ICSA)
  • Clean Shipping Coalition (CSC)
  • Break Free From Plastics Coalition (BFFP)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Carbon in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Carbon Market Watch? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Carbon Market Watch engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 7 files, from Carbon Market Watch or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Carbon Market Watch filed 7 positions between 20 Jul 2023 and 10 Jun 2026, across 7 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.

2023 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2026 · 5 filed

What they argued

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)filed 20 Jul 2023PDFsource

Green Claims Directive: Open Consultation Carbon Market Watch’s response to the Green Claims Directive public consultation Introduction Carbon Market Watch welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Green Claims Directive (GCD).1 Misleading and unsubstantiated green claims are widespread and must be addressed.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Revision of the benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances (2026-2030)filed 8 Jun 2026PDFsource

The regular update of the benchmarks values for free allowances under the EU ETS is a necessary step to ensure that the last years of the free allocation system are fully coherent with the aim of a full phase-out by 2034 for all sectors, and provide the investment signals necessary to funnel funding into industrial decarbonisation.

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 10 Jun 2026PDFsource

Carbon Market Watch is concerned with the willingness of the European Commission to allow for domestic and international credits to account as carbon price paid in a third country. Not only this represents a discrepancy with the current EU ETS architecture, but sets a dangerous precedent that incentivises the establishment of crediting schemes with no qualitative safeguards. Our feedback is in the document attached.

Legal framework for the possible use of international carbon credits towards the 2040 EU climate law targetfiled 30 Apr 2026PDFsource

Note: the following response is to be read together with the accompanying PDF that was attached, which contains sources and citations and develops our position in more detail. When carrying out its impact assessment, the Commission should consider that any option allowing the EU to rely on international credits to facilitate the achievement of its 2040 climate target is problematic for the following reasons: 1.

Update of the governance of the Energy Union and climate actionfiled 19 Mar 2026PDFsource

Carbon Market Watchs response focuses on the role of carbon dioxide removals planning and reporting within the Governance Regulation framework. Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDR) are measures and technologies that draw down carbon from the atmosphere and store it over relevant time horizons, so the removed CO2 can no longer contribute to climate breakdown.

Report on the evaluation of the LULUCF Regulationfiled 11 Jul 2024PDFsource

There is no way around it: the EU LULUCF carbon sink is shrinking. The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change (ESABCC) confirmed that the EU net sink has been declining rapidly over the last 10 years, decreasing by 2021 to a third of its 2005 total (ESABCC, 2024).

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 139.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Carbon Market Watch’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.