Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CUA

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)

NGO · Finland · EU Transparency Register 56039441735-48

29
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
23
legislative files
of 665 tracked
15
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #10 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • MTK is a member of European farmers´ umbrella organisation Copa: www.copa-cogeca.eu
  • Confédération Européenne des Propriétaires Forestiers :www.cepf-eu.org

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain Keskusliitto – Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)
Head office
Helsinki, Finland
EU office
Brussels

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track The in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) filed 29 positions between 27 Feb 2019 and 1 Jun 2026, across 23 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 15 times.

2019 · 1 filed2020 · 5 filed2021 · 3 filed2022 · 3 filed2023 · 1 filed2024 · 4 filed2025 · 5 filed2026 · 7 filed

What they argued

Circular Economy Actfiled 6 Nov 2025source

MTK finds the overall paper and its goals acceptable and supports them. From the perspective of the Finnish farmers and forest owners the current state of the European circular economy has the following problems: 1. The price of circular material is almost always more than virgin material.

Renewable Energy Directivefiled 16 Nov 2021source

MTK is in favour of a separate minimum share for advanced biofuels and biogas produced from raw materials in Part A of Annex IX. MTK is also in favour of abolishing double counting. Finland has already abandoned double counting in the past, and the blending obligation rates applied in Finland are significantly higher than those imposed by the EU.

Right to Stay Strategy: Your Region, Your Futurefiled 1 Jun 2026source

Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners in Finland (MTK) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to prepare a Right to Stay communication. The possibility to live, work, and build ones future in their home region is a key part of territorial cohesion, equal opportunities, and social sustainability in the European Union.

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated actfiled 4 Dec 2025PDFsource

The Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) want to thank for the opportunity to comment the technical screening criteria on the EU taxonomy climate delegated act. MTK has previously emphasized in the preparation of taxonomy criteria the importance of criteria being encouraging, practically applicable, and accessible. Only in this way can taxonomy achieve broad usability and impact.

Amending certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countriesfiled 17 Mar 2026source

MTK supports the European Commission’s proposal to update the Basic Regulation on organic production as it clarifies the existing legal basis and strengthens its internal coherence. Coordinated and structurally clearer provisions will make the whole easier to understand and support consistent implementation of regulation across all production sectors.

Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission

Amending certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countriesfiled 18 Nov 2025PDFsource

Justification for the Revision of Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on Organic Production Finlands Perspective The European Commissions intention to revise Regulation (EU) 2018/848 presents a timely and necessary opportunity to address regulatory provisions that have proven problematic in practice and that hinder the development and competitiveness of organic production, particularly in Nordic conditions.

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 2 Feb 2023PDFsource

Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners MTK ry Anssi Kainulainen Ref. Ares(2023)771673 - 02/02/2023 2.2.2023 European Commission Feedback to COM on Certification of Carbon Removals – EU rules Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owner’s (MTK) considers, that It is a good that the legislative initiative that has been taken is voluntary for operators to participate.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 29 Apr 2022PDFsource

The role of the EU in the certification of carbon removals To secure in the long run the possibility for landowners to sell their carbon credits also internationally and outside the EU we need credible, transparent, and market-based solutions.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 18 Nov 2021source

The Carbon Limit Mechanism (CBAM) is an important part of the overall effort to ensure a level playing field for the EU’s own operators as part of the implementation of the EU Green Deal. From the perspective of the Central Union of Agricultural and Forestry Producers (MTK), the process highlights the following: 1. The EU tool shall implement this objective at the least possible administrative cost. 2.

Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 1 Apr 2020PDFsource

I'm representing the Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK). MTK is an interest organisation representing farmers, forest owners and rural entrepreneurs in Finland. MTK has over 316 000 members in local agricultural producers’ organisations and regional forest management associations. In principle the CBAM could be an excellent measure to avoid carbon leakage in all sectors.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 10 Apr 2026PDFsource

The Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) want to thank for the opportunity to comment the revision regarding the technical screening criteria on the EU taxonomy climate delegated act. MTK has previously emphasized in the preparation of taxonomy criteria the importance of criteria being encouraging, practically applicable, and accessible.

Nature restorationfiled 19 Aug 2022PDFsource

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) Ref. Ares(2022)5821597 - 19/08/2022 1 (5) Helsinki, Finland 19th August 2022 MTK’s feedback on the proposal for a regulation on nature restoration The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) thanks for the opportunity to give feedback on the proposal for a regulation on nature restoration.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Nature restorationfiled 1 Dec 2020PDFsource

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) Ref. Ares(2020)7228899 - 01/12/2020 1/2 Helsinki, Finland 1 December 2020 st MTK’s feedback on the Roadmap “Protecting biodiversity: nature restoration targets under EU Biodiversity Strategy” (Inception Impact Assessment) MTK supports the main goal of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 which aims at halting the loss of biodiversity.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Framework for achieving climate neutralityfiled 16 Sept 2025PDFsource

The Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners MTK thanks for the opportunity to comment the Commissions proposal for the European Climate Law amendment. MTK supports the EU overall climate target for 2040.

Simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden in the areas of batteries and industrial emissions reporting (Omnibus VIII on environmental legislation)filed 7 May 2026source

The Environment Omnibus is a good starting point for reducing the administrative burden related to environmental legislation, but further work is needed. The Commissions own Vision for Agriculture and Food recognises the urgent need for cross-cutting simplification beyond the CAP; however, in practice, this proposal delivers only very limited relief.

Roadmap towards Nature Creditsfiled 30 Sept 2025PDFsource

MTK welcomes the European Commissions roadmap regarding the development of nature credits. Nationally and internationally, there is an urgent need to find innovative and widely acceptable solutions to better protect biodiversity and to arrange adequate funding for action. According to MTK, voluntary nature value market is a central part of reaching success.

Update of the EU Arctic policyfiled 13 Mar 2026PDFsource

Statement by the Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK), Finland MTK considers the update of the EU arctic Policy necessary. The geopolitical changes following Russias invasion of Ukraine have significantly affected the operating environment in arctic regions, increasing the importance of security policy. The EU must therefore update its arctic-related policies. 1.

Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)filed 5 Nov 2021PDFsource

MTK welcomes COM proposal to review LULUCF EU rules. MTK's feed-back includes aspects of proposed calculation methodology, ambition level, compatibility with Paris Agreement, compatibility with coming initiative on restoring sustainable carbon cycles, voluntary carbon market mechanisms, general flexibility, establishing AFOLU, flexibilities of the framwork and environmental integrity.

Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)filed 26 Nov 2020source

The key elements for forests to combat the climate change are Substitution, Sequestration and Storage. Forests are unique in doing all this at the same time. All sectors must carry responsibility in the path towards climate neutrality by 2050.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 7 Feb 2024PDFsource

Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) Ref. Ares(2024)932051 - 07/02/2024 Forest Monitoring Framework for Resilient Forests Commission’s feedback Forest Monitoring Framework for Resilient European Forests The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners MTK welcomes to express views on the Forest Monitoring Regulation proposed by the European Commission in November 2023.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 3 May 2022source

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) welcomes the initiative of the Commission to have an impact assessment of the proposal for a new legislative proposal on EU Forest Observation Reporting and Data Collection to ensure a coordinated EU forest monitoring, data collection and reporting system.

Revision of EU rules to protect the marine environmentfiled 20 Feb 2026source

Achieving good environmental status in the marine environment, while simplifying the implementation of the Directive and reducing the administrative burden, is a good objective. It is necessary to reduce the administrative burden for operators other than public authorities, where this has been accumulated. It is important that the MSPD is aligned with the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive and the Ocean Act.

Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission

Just Transition Fundfiled 11 Mar 2020source

The Green Deal proposed by the EU Commission contains a wide range of climate actions. Quite a many of those presents new demands on the agriculture and forestry climate policy, while at the same time both the overall level of the EU financial framework for several years and the financial share of agriculture are threatened with cuts.

Report on the evaluation of the LULUCF Regulationfiled 4 Jul 2024PDFsource

The Finnish Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) would like to emphasize the role of the sustainable forest management and a strong bioeconomy sector for achieving the EU climate targets for 2040. The entire answer can be found enclosed. Climate actions by forests are based with long-term processes and careful planning.

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Conventionfiled 3 Apr 2020source

The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) recognizes the importance of the general principles of the Aarhus Convention in relation to access to justice in environmental matters. However, the Commission’s initiative described in the roadmap includes actions that are not justifiable from the point of view of the Aarhus Convention.

Evaluation of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2017-2024filed 8 Apr 2024source

The Central Union of Finnish farmers and forest owners appreciates and thanks Commission evaluation of EFSAs operation. Food safety is extremely important issue and EFSAs has done responsible work for it. Local circumstances should be better taken in to account. Specially we recognized this in poultry studies where Finnish production method was not taken into account.

Review of Agricultural State aid Guidelinesfiled 27 Feb 2019source

Helsinki, the 27th of February 2019 Feedback on the European Commission inception impact assessment: Review of Agricultural State aid Guidelines and Review of the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) welcomes the European Commission initiative to review the Agricultural State aid Guidelines and the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation (ABER).

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 718.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.