Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FOR

Fortum

Company · Finland · EU Transparency Register 03501997362-71

27
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
26
legislative files
of 665 tracked
20
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #22 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€700K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Fortum Corporation's collaboration partners.
  • https://www.fortum.com/about-us/our-company/public-affairs/collaboration-partners

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Registered as
Fortum Oyj (Fortum Corporation)
Head office
Espoo, Finland
EU office
Brussels

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Fortum in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Fortum

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Fortum? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Fortum filed 27 positions between 20 Mar 2020 and 11 Jun 2026, across 26 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 20 times.

2020 · 8 filed2021 · 1 filed2022 · 4 filed2023 · 3 filed2025 · 5 filed2026 · 6 filed

What they argued

Public Procurement Actfiled 26 Jan 2026PDFsource

1 (2) Ref. Ares(2026)884935 - 26/01/2026 26 January 2026 FORTUM’S COMMENTS ON THE REVISION OF THE EU PUBLIC PROCUREMENT DIRECTIVES Background The European Commission will propose a revision of the EU rules on public procurement in Q2 2026.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Renewable Energy Directivefiled 21 Sept 2020source

In line with the European Green Deal, and the urgent need for a stronger action against climate change, we strongly support the EU’s climate neutrality goal for 2050 and the recent Commission’s proposal to increase the EU 2030 greenhouse gas emission reduction target at least 55% from 1990 level.

Evaluation of the Public Procurement Directivesfiled 5 Mar 2025PDFsource

We appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the Public Procurement Act, which is crucial to making the procurement process more accessible and efficient. The current system is overly bureaucratic and costly, particularly for SMEs. Complex tendering procedures and excessive documentation discourage participation, creating a market dominated by large corporations.

Energy performance of buildingsfiled 31 Mar 2022PDFsource

30th March 2022 FORTUM VIEWS ON THE PROPOSAL FOR THE REVISION OF THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF THE BUILDINGS DIRECTIVE (‘EPBD’ RECAST) 15/12/2021 1. PREFACE Fortum welcomes the recast proposal for the EPBD which targets to align the contribution from the buildings sector with the overall FF55 targets.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Simplification of certain sustainability reporting standardsfiled 3 Jun 2026PDFsource

Fortum appreciates the work done by EFRAG and the Commission to simplify the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). We support the aim to cut administrative burden for EU businesses while preserving the quality of sustainability disclosures. Fortum mainly supports the draft final versions, however, we still see a need for some clarifications and amendments. Please find our feedback attached.

Artificial Intelligence Actfiled 10 Sept 2020source

Fortum would like to see a regulatory framework for AI based on the following principles: Accountability should be the key element when creating an AI regulatory framework instead of creating exhaustive lists of sectors and critical use with demands of prior conformity assessments and approval.

Waste Framework Directive: textiles and food wastefiled 17 Nov 2023PDFsource

Please find attached Fortum's feedback to the consultation on the Environmental impact of waste management - revision of EU waste framework. The same information can also be found here: https://www.fortum.com/about-us/public-affairs/our-views-and-positions

Waste Framework Directive: textiles and food wastefiled 18 Feb 2022source

Fortum welcomes the initiative to revise the waste directive with the aim to improve waste management to move further up in the waste hierarchy. Regarding incineration of residual waste, currently new techniques are developed and residues from incineration of waste that historically has been disposed of may be recovered for valuable minerals and metals, which in turn can be recycled into recycled raw materials.

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligencefiled 22 May 2022PDFsource

Key messages of Fortum, one of the leading energy companies in Europe: - Fortum welcomes the EU initiative and the aim to create a level playing field for companies and avoid a fragmentation of due diligence obligations - Legal certainty for companies and reasonable administrative burden must be ensured - Clear definitions and obligations are needed - Regarding the obligations, a clear distinction between direct and…

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 7 Feb 2023PDFsource

Position paper attached. Summary below Introduction Every year, Europeans generate nearly 100 million tonnes of unrecycled waste that is turned into energy. Incineration is an important part of the current waste management system. We at Fortum believe that all carbon belongs in circulation. This means that also emissions are turned into new raw materials. To do this at scale, we need to rethink CO2 in recycling.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 20 Mar 2020PDFsource

Risk for carbon leakage to be addressed in the context of higher climate ambition Fortum as a major European utility recognises the need to address the increasing carbon leakage risk for the European industries in the context of higher climate ambition and supports the Commission’s initiative to investigate measures in mitigating carbon leakage and establishing a carbon border adjustment (CBA) mechanism in the EU.

Energy Efficiency Directivefiled 21 Sept 2020PDFsource

Monik Ref. Ares(2020)4931943 - 21/09/2020 1 (2) 21st September 2020 Public Affairs, Harri-Pekka Korhonen FORTUM VIEWS ON THE INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF EU’S ENERGY EFFICIENCY ROADMAP – REVISION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY DIRECTIVE (EED 2012/2018) We support the EU Commission’s aim to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions by 55 % by 2030.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transportfiled 23 Nov 2020PDFsource

Fortum wants to highlight the following issues as the key in the upcoming revision of the Emissions Trading Directive and related Impact Assessment. More detailed feedback is available in the attached file. Allocation of the revised 2030 target between the ETS and non-ETS sectors Following the adoption of the new 2030 emissions reduction target, the Commission needs to prepare a holistic analysis on the most…

Revision of the Energy Tax Directivefiled 30 Mar 2020source

ENERGY TAXATION DIRECTIVE 2003/96/EC - INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESMENT Fortum welcomes the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD) 2003/96/EC and Commission’s roadmap for it. Revision of the Energy Taxation Directive is an integral part of the European Green Deal and should therefore focus on environmental issues according to the Inception Impact Assessment.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026PDFsource

Fortum appreciates the work done by the Commission to streamline the taxonomy criteria. We strongly support the goal of the revision to make the framework simpler and easier to use. Fortum agrees with the conclusion that the EU Taxonomy Regulation is a cornerstone of the EUs sustainable finance framework, steering investments towards sustainable projects.

Nature restorationfiled 1 Dec 2020source

Fortum’s feedback on the Inception Impact Assessment for the EU nature restoration targets Fortum supports the EU Biodiversity Strategy and its aim to protect and restore species and habitats. Biodiversity loss and the degradation of ecosystems are a severe global concern that has to be tackled.

Batteries and waste batteriesfiled 23 Feb 2021PDFsource

Fortum welcomes the European Commission´s proposal COM(2020) 798 for a regulation concerning batteries and waste batteries, which sets minimum sustainability requirements for batteries in the entire value chain. Having a strong battery value chain is of strategic value and importance for Europe as well as for our industry.

Electrification Action Planfiled 9 Oct 2025PDFsource

Fortum welcomes the European Commissions Electrification Action Plan as a milestone to make clean electricity Europes next growth engine. Our contribution outlines how clear demand signals, predictable prices and efficient grids can unlock investment and accelerate industrial decarbonisation.

Shipments of wastefiled 14 Jan 2022PDFsource

As part of Fortum corporation, the Fortum recycling & waste business area support the objectives of the proposal for a revised Waste Shipment Regulation. Fortum submitted a reply to EC's Public Consultation on the WSR in June 2020 and is pleased to see that several of the company's policy objectives have been addressed in the EC's proposal.

Heating and cooling strategyfiled 9 Oct 2025PDFsource

H&C strategy should ensure, enable and accelerate the de-carbonization, energy security, energy efficiency and affordability in the heating and cooling and its potential to integrate with the low carbon electricity system. This will require to effectively and imperatively phase out the use of fossil fuels in buildings and industries.

Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)filed 23 Nov 2020source

Fortum supports a separate target for greenhouse gas emission reductions and carbon removals. The proposal for at least 55% emission reductions should be absolute and it should not include carbon sinks. Also the use of flexibilities from the LULUCF sink should be limited to the current level until there is a robust and trustworthy enough MRV system in place.

Revision of the EU’s energy security frameworkfiled 13 Oct 2025PDFsource

In todays complex geopolitical landscape, energy security has become a cornerstone of Europes resilience. Fortums contribution highlights how clean, reliable energy underpins economic stability, public safety, and national preparedness.

Establishment of a common Union rating scheme for data centresfiled 22 Apr 2026PDFsource

Fortum has submitted a response to the European Commission's public consultation on the draft Delegated Regulation establishing a Common Union Rating Scheme for Data Centres (Ares(2026)3247482). Our position covers key issues including the granularity of Guarantees of Origin, the 10-year asset age requirement, the role of firm low-carbon baseload such as nuclear, and the proportionality of the waste heat reuse ready…

Revision of the REMIT Implementing Regulation on data reportingfiled 16 Sept 2025source

Fortum welcome and appreciate the opportunity to give feedback on the REMIT II Implementing Regulation on Data Reporting. Generally, Fortum is concerned that the draft regulation increases the reporting burden without providing a corresponding surveillance benefit.

Evaluation of Radioactive Waste Directive and Shipment Directivefiled 22 Apr 2026PDFsource

Fortum has submitted a response to the European Commission's public consultation on the review of the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipments Directive (2006/117/Euratom). Drawing on nearly five decades of nuclear operations at the Loviisa Nuclear Power Plant, our position supports a targeted, evidence-based approach to any future amendments and highlights a specific definitional gap…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Fortum next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 1066.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Fortum’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.