Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
GTD

Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling

NGO · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 358435338994-90

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #501 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Rådet for Grøn Omstilling (RGO)
Head office
København K, Denmark

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Green in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling filed 2 positions between 29 Jan 2021 and 1 Jun 2021, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Revision of EU rules on food contact materialsfiled 29 Jan 2021source

Green Transition Denmark welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the European Commission Roadmap on the revision of EU rules on Food Contact Materials (FCMs). We have four overall points we consider essential: 1) The EU needs to ban all hazardous chemicals in all FCM to honour the commitments of the Green Deal and the new Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (and not partial regulations, such as BPA).

Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicalsfiled 1 Jun 2021source

Green Transition Denmark (GTD) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission’s discussions of the revision of EU’s REACH chemicals regulation. GTD is a Danish NGO working to promote a green and sustainable transition of society. We have many years of experience with the chemicals area and have especially focus on endocrine disrupters and other areas that are not covered by the REACH legislation.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 18.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Green Transition Denmark/Rådet for Grøn Omstilling’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.