Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CDR

CDRterra

Academic / research · Germany

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track CDRterra in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at CDRterra? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file CDRterra engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from CDRterra or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

CDRterra filed 2 positions between 2 May 2022 and 23 Mar 2023, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed

What they argued

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 23 Mar 2023PDFsource

We welcome the proposal of the European Commission to establish a certification framework for carbon removals and the possibility to give feedback to it. The certification framework proposal of the European Commission introduces the QU.A.L.ITY criteria which relate to quantification, additionality, long-term storage, and sustainability, which we welcome as a starting point.

Union certification framework for carbon removalsfiled 2 May 2022PDFsource

We welcome the EU's aim to reach climate neutrality by 2050 and this public consultation on how to upscale carbon removal solutions “while ensuring no negative impact on biodiversity or ecosystem deterioration in line with the precautionary and Do No Significant Harm principles” (SCC communication) and recognizing potential co-benefits, as per council conclusions (7728/22).

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put CDRterra next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from CDRterra’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.