Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2025/0419(COD) · Trilogue

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

322 submissions from 316 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 723 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 322 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee ENVIRapporteur Mohammed Chahim (S&D)Next Debate in EP plenary 14 Sept 2026
  1. TABLING_PLENARY · 9 Jul 2026
  2. Adoption of a report by the EP committee responsible · 6 Jul 2026
  3. Committee Report Adopted · 6 Jul 2026
  4. Final opinion sent · 29 Jun 2026
  5. Committee Opinion Adopted · 24 Jun 2026

Who showed up

280 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 24 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 11.7 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 280Civil society 24Public authorities, academia, other 18

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

141 of 316
in the EU Register
746
full-time lobbying staff
€100.0M+
declared costs a year
514
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 26 Aug 2025 — it ran from 1 Jul 2025.

Policy area
Taxation & trade (DG TAXUD)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Trilogue
Lead committee
ENVI
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2025

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment26 Aug 2025
  2. Public consultation26 Aug 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Proposal for a regulation.

322 positions · showing 25

SP

Stegra (Previously H2 Green Steel)

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

Stegra fully supports the European Commissions ambition with the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which targets the embedded carbon emissions of products imported into the EU in specific sectors that are within the scope of the EU ETS and the most at risk of carbon leakage.

LinkedInX
SG

STX Group

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

STX Group (STX) welcomes the introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commissions initiative to assess possible scope extensions, anti circumvention measures, and clarify the rules on indirect emissions. Our comments refer mainly to the rules for calculation of emissions for electricity. Please see the attached PDF for our full feedback.

LinkedInX
PC

Polish Chamber of Chemical Industry

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Member of European Chemical Industry Council CEFIC Warsaw, 26.08.2025 Polish Chamber of Chemical Industry submission to the public consultation on Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – downstream extension, anti-circumvention and rules on electricity emissions As the national organization representing the chemical industry in Poland, the Polish Chamber of Chemical Industry (PIPC) submits the following views to…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
ET

Energy Traders Europe

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

We support the overall objective of CBAM as a tool to put a fair price on the carbon emitted during the production of carbon-intensive goods imported into the EU, to avoid carbon leakage, and to encourage cleaner industrial production in non-EU countries.

LinkedInX
HS

Herisson sprl

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

We are a consulting company specialised in commodity trading advisory with a focus on power markets. The uncertainties created by the absence of guidance are putting a toll on trading in general making impossible, i.e to correctly price cross border capacities between any EU country and a non-EU.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
RO
PDF

The Republic of South Africas (SA) Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic) would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to comment on the EUs Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) downstream extension, additional anticircumvention measures and rules for the electricity sector: legislative proposal to amend the CBAM Regulation (EU 2023/956).

LinkedInX
DI

Danish Industry

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Danish Industry August 26th 2025 CBAM – downstream expansion On behalf of Danish Industry, we thank you for the opportunity to provide input to the consultation regarding conditions and procedures related to the status of CBAM scope expansion.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
TP

TN Polska

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

Downstream extension of CBAM rules shall also cover HS group 8482 (ball and roller bearings). In most cases, their components are purely manufactered from steel. Such an extension is really a must if we want to keep the manufacturing processes within EU, to serve at least our regional market. Internal costs optimizations are not enough here to recover competitiveness against Asian suppliers.

LinkedInX
TD

T&D Europe

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

T&D Europe, the European Association of the Electricity Transmission and Distribution Equipment and Services Industry, would like to use this opportunity to raise its key recommendations. While CBAM can play a significant role in advancing environmental objectives, its implementation must carefully address potential risks, particularly negative trade impacts for both exports and imports of businesses operating in…

LinkedInX
IF

Institut für Stahlbetonbewehrung e.V.

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

The current efforts of the EU to decarbonize the steel industry and at the same time remain internationally competitive require mandatory regulatory compensation measures in order to maintain pressure on non-EU countries and industries to also adapt these targets if they also want to serve the European market.

LinkedInX
BN

Brazilian National Confederation of Industry (CNI)

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

August 26, 2025 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – downstream extension, anti-circumvention and rules on electricity emissions The Brazilian National Confederation of Industry (CNI) welcomes the consultation being undertaken by the European Commission regarding the possible extension of CBAM to downstream products, as well as anti-circumvention measures, prior to proposing any regulations on these matters.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
DI

Duferco International Trading Holding

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The finalisation of ongoing CBAM legislative acts should take precedence over any scope extension, bringing the existing regulation to an operationally stable state that is clear and practical for all stakeholders.

LinkedInX
RS

Reinforcing Steel Europe

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is an important instrument for creating fair competition and offsetting the sustainability costs arising from the abolition of the ETS. At the same time, an adjustment and the associated closure of loopholes is essential to guarantee fair competition and prevent the migration of CO2-intensive industries.

LinkedInX
AB

ABAL - Brazilian Aluminium Association

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

The Brazilian Aluminium Association (ABAL) appreciates the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) downstream extension, anti-circumvention and rules on electricity emissions". Below we highlight the points we consider most relevant and on which we would like to suggest adjustments, in order to strengthen the sustainable objectives of the European CBAM: 1.

LinkedInX
TP

Trafigura PTE Ltd Branch Office Geneva

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Trafigura Response August 2025 Introduction & Who We Are Trafigura is one of the world’s largest commodity trading and logistics companies, supplying metals and minerals, oil and petroleum products, and gas and power into the EU. The Group also owns a diverse European portfolio of assets.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
IE

industriAll European Trade union

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

To limit the risk of delocalisation of manufacturing activities downstream the value chain, CBAM should also apply to additional intermediate and finished products. A CBAM that would lead to offshore assembly or finishing industrial activities would be an unacceptable threat to employment in industries and would be in conflict with the EU industrial strategy objectives such as the open strategic autonomy.

LinkedInX
EE

ePURE - European renewable ethanol

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

ePURE is the association representing the European producers of renewable ethanol from sustainably grown crops, waste, and residues, with renewable ethanol classified under NACE 20.14 - Manufacture of other organic basic chemicals and 20.51 - the Manufacture of liquid biofuels (20.51).

LinkedInX
NL

Nemo Link Limited

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Nemo Link welcomes the opportunity to provide its views to the EC consultation on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) downstream extension, anti-circumvention and rules on electricity emissions. The current EU CBAM legislation will lead to many unintended and negative consequences for electricity trade, notably for trading electricity between the EU and the UK.

LinkedInX
NB

NV Bekaert SA

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Directorate_General for Taxation and Customs Union Unit C-5 (Economic Analysis and Taxation of Exempted Sectors) August 26, 2025 Call for evidence for an impact assessment - Comments submitted on behalf of NV Bekaert S.A. to the public consultation on the “Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – downstream extension, additional anti-circumvention measures and rules for the electricity sector” Introduction 1.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
C

CBA

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

1. It is important to include new products in the aluminium downstream chain, but it is also crucial to look upstream and consider relevant steps of production emissions that are currently not covered by the CBAM, such as the alumina refinery and emissions related to electricity consumption. 2.

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BT

Brazilian Tree Industry

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

1. CBAM should not be expanded for downstream goods without technical criterion. We recommend that the possible inclusion of downstream goods in the CBAM be preceded by specific analyses of Technical Capability of Quantification at non-EU origins ", respecting different development realities.

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ET

European Tyre & Rubber Manufacturers Association (ETRMA)

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

In the context of the public consultation on the extension of the scope of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to downstream products, the European Tyre Industry (ETRMA) would like to share its key recommendations and policy considerations on behalf of its members. Tyre manufacturing is energy intensive. It enables Europes economy and society.

LinkedInX
TE

Transport & Environment (T&E)

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Extending CBAM to downstream products would level the playing field by ensuring that cars imported from abroad follow the same regime as EU-made ones by paying a price on the carbon. Granting such a level playing field between vehicles produced in Europe versus those produced outside of Europe would reinforce the competitiveness of the European car industry.

LinkedInX
MC

Minerals Council SA

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

RECOGNITION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN CARBON TAX AS AN EFFECTIVE CARBON PRICE PAID UNDER EUROPEAN UNION (EU) CARBON BORDER ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM (CBAM) 1 INTRODUCTION The Minerals Council South Africa (Minerals Council) serves as a prominent industry association, representing mining companies that collectively contribute approximately 90% of South Africa’s mineral production by value.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
A

AGROFERT

· · filed 26 Aug 2025 · source

We welcome the European Commissions initiative to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) scope to downstream products. Without this, sectors such as melamine remain exposed to carbon leakage and risk losing competitiveness. European melamine producers face increasing pressure from cheaper, high-emission melamine imports, particularly from countries with weaker climate policies.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 322 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.