Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SU

Steel Union

Industry association · Czechia

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.

6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Steel in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Steel Union

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Steel Union? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Steel Union filed 6 positions between 8 Jul 2025 and 8 Jun 2026, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 5 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Circular Economy Actfiled 6 Nov 2025source

We welcome the initiative of the European Commission to prepare a comprehensive Circular Economy Act (CEA) aimed at accelerating the transition towards a more circular economy in the European Union. The forthcoming Circular Economy Act offers an important opportunity to reposition circularity from being seen purely as an environmental concept to a strategic industrial policy instrument that strengthens the EUs…

EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisationfiled 8 Jul 2025source

In the last years EU has lost its strong industry companies and is continuously loosing production/capacities, competitiveness. Companies are not able to decarbonise as they planned due to lack of enabling conditions (competitive energy costs and certainty about stability of energy supply, weak carbon leakage and trade protection, sufficient financial support without unnecessary conditionality, availability of raw…

Objection to ETS Benchmark Values Regulation 2026–2030filed 8 Jun 2026source

Dear colleagues. Below please find attached our feedback. On one hand, we do not support the 2026-2030 benchmarks (BMs) as proposed by the COM, especially due to the fall-back BMs values. There is an extreme variability of installations using such BMs, both from the size and processes side, that one common BM value is totally irrelevant and can significantly and unjustifiably harm many installations.

Framework for achieving climate neutralityfiled 15 Sept 2025PDFsource

We strongly oppose the proposed 90% climate target for 2040 as this would directly endanger existence of the steel sector in the EU, with all the social, economic and strategic consequences. No ambitious goals should be set until enabling conditions for decarbonisation are in place. Please, read more in the attached position.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Steel Union next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 262.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Steel Union’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.