In response to this call for evidence we provide evidence and policy recommendations in relation to the following question: How can the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism be redesigned to help with its goals for net zero? In addressing this question, we focus on the potential improvements of the border adjustment mechanism that should support decarbonisation policies and mitigate the risk of carbon leakage.
University of Vienna
Academic / research · Austria
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at University of Vienna? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
University of Vienna filed 3 positions between 15 May 2025 and 26 Nov 2025, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The University of Vienna welcomes the European Commissions efforts to establish a forward-looking and integrated strategy for research and technology infrastructures across the European Research Area (ERA). As one of the oldest and largest universities in Europe, the University of Vienna strongly supports the initiative's emphasis on sustainability, strategic investment, and cross-border collaboration.
To fully realise Europes ambitions in quantum technologies, the EU Quantum Act should support the development of regional hubs that combine research excellence, prototyping capacities, industry collaboration, and talent development.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put University of Vienna next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 11.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from University of Vienna’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.