Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BI

Booost, Inc.

Company · Japan

4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Booost, in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Booost, Inc.? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Booost, Inc. engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 4 files, from Booost, Inc. or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Booost, Inc. filed 4 positions between 26 Aug 2025 and 25 Sept 2025, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) methodology for the definitive periodfiled 25 Sept 2025source

Over the past three years, my company has been preparing compliance measures for secondary iron and steel products subject to the EU-CBAM. Based on this experience, I would like to respectfully submit the following observations and requests regarding the definitive period. First, we request that the Council promptly adopt the omnibus bill already approved by the European Parliament.

Adjustment of the obligation to surrender CBAM certificates to take account of ETS free allowances phase-outfiled 25 Sept 2025source

Thank you for the opportunity to express our opinion on the CBAM. It is evident that the treatment of CBAM certificates submitted by certified declarants must be adjusted to reflect the scope of free allocation of EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) allowances. We recognize that how such adjustments are made is primarily an internal EU matter and not one on which companies in third countries should take a position.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 136.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Booost, Inc.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.