Gesamtverband der deutschen Textil- und Modeindustrie e. V.
Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 630565418685-37
8
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
8
legislative files
of 326 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #188 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
1. Forschungskuratorium Textil e.V.
2. Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V.
3. Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände e.V.
4. EURATEX European Apparel and Textile Confederation
5. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft
6. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.
7. IAF International Apparel Federation
8. Wittenberg-Zentrum für Globale Ethik e.V.
9. Forum für Zukunftsenergien e.V.
10. ifo Institut Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V.
11. Deutscher Verband Nanotechnologie e. V.
12. Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main e. V.
and 10 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Confederation of the German Textile and Fashion Industry (textil+mode)
Head office
Berlin, Germany
EU office
Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Gesamtverband der deutschen Textil- und Modeindustrie e. V.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Gesamtverband der deutschen Textil- und Modeindustrie e. V. filed 8 positions between 25 Aug 2025 and 8 Jun 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
Germany’s medium-sized energy-intensive industry is facing a historically unprecedented crisis, leading not only to the outward movement of production, but also to plant closures and job losses. Energy-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises are committed to the European Union’s climate goals and want to follow this path by 2050.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) is a completely new measure that has not yet been tested and is incomplete in its design. In its current form, it risks jeopardising the competitiveness of European industry and not providing effective protection against carbon leakage. A substantial improvement of the mechanism is urgently needed to achieve its objectives.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Confederation of the German Textile and Fashion Industry (t+m) welcomes the European Commissions commitment to reducing administrative burdens within environmental legislation. As a key industrial sector for Europes circular transition, the textile and fashion industry requires a coherent, practical, and economically viable regulatory framework to successfully deliver circularity in practice.
The proposed DPP registry introduces an additional centralized registration requirement alongside existing regulatory frameworks and registries, such as those within the context of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR).
The EU’s main goal in the area of energy and climate policy is climate neutrality by 2050. The only instrument needed to achieve this objective is the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), as it securely achieves a clearly defined climate target while being efficient.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
textil+mode (t+m), representing the German textile and fashion industry, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the evaluation of the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR). While supporting the BPRs objectives, we highlight key challenges for textile downstream users regarding predictability and transparency of regulatory processes, availability of approved active substances for critical applications (including…
textil+mode supports the objective of protecting children from CMR 1A/1B substances in childcare products. Our comments therefore do not concern the objective of the proposal, but its practical implementation. As set out in the attached statement, the proposed restriction should be revised to ensure that it can be implemented by companies and enforced by authorities.
Textil+Mode (t+m), representing the German textile and fashion industry, welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on long-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (C9C21 PFCAs), their salts and related compounds. We identify key issues regarding regulatory coherence, scope alignment with the Stockholm Convention and enforceability.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Gesamtverband der deutschen Textil- und Modeindustrie e. V.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.