We welcome the opportunity to respond to the European Commission Consultation regarding a Digital Omnibus Proposal. Listed below are our main points of simplification measures: 1. A full and inclusive mapping and stress-testing of the EUs Digital Rulebook, alongside setting a high threshold for any new digital regulation, during this legislative term.
Ericsson
Company · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 02021363105-42
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #134 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- DIGITALEUROPE →
- ETNO
- GSMA →
- ICC
- ERT
- 5G-AA
- 5G-ACIA
- EATA
- IP Europe →
- EFM
- Business Europe →
- ITI
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Ericsson in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Ericsson? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Ericsson filed 11 positions between 3 Apr 2020 and 15 Jun 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
Call for Evidence: Circular economy act Ericsson feedback and comments Analysis 2025-10-09 Contents 2025-10-09 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Materials and circularity of the information and communication industry (ICT) ...................................................................
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Digital Networks Act Proposal A good first step in developing a more supportive policy framework for investment in advanced and trusted connectivity in Europe 1. Investment in advanced and trusted connectivity must remain the DNA´s Northern Star 2. The DNA’s spectrum policy proposals can play a key role in incentivizing investment in Europe´s advanced and trusted connectivity 3.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Europes future competitiveness and security depend on closing the investment and deployment gap in next-generation digital infrastructure, with the DNA serving as a catalyst to enable scale, unlock investment, and integrate connectivity into Europes industrial and technological strategy.
Ericsson welcomes the EU Commission’s proposal as a crucial step in ensuring a level playing field and harmonization. The Directive however needs to be more firmly grounded in the key existing international standards on sustainability due diligence adopted by the UN and the OECD.
Ericsson welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence on the potential extension of the EU CBAM. Ericssons view is that, from a competitiveness perspective, it is important that EU companies are competing on the same conditions as companies that export into EU. However, Ericsson also argues that advanced and complex downstream products should not be included in the future extension.
Ericsson welcomes the European Commissions call for evidence and the initiative to establish the EU Quantum Act to position Europe as a global leader in Quantum technologies. To ensure global leadership in Quantum, the European Union should adopt a coordinated strategy that accelerates research, development, and industrial deployment.
Ericsson thanks the European Commission (EC) for the opportunity to provide real world feedback on this call for evidence on future legislation aiming to create a European Research Area as a single market for researchers, scientific knowledge and technology across the European Union.
Ericsson wishes to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to provide input into this Call for Evidence for an Impact Assessment, and hereby respectfully submits its comments in reply thereto. As mentioned in the Call for Evidence ‘intangible assets are the cornerstones of today’s economy’, and ‘an effective intellectual property (‘IP’) framework needs to strike a balance between promoting innovation by…
Ericsson welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Commission in relation to a potential Council decision on WRC-23. WRC is a key opportunity for spectrum harmonization, including technical conditions. As stated by the Commission, decisions at WRC can affect EU policies and thus it is of high importance that a common EU position exists and that EU countries can defend it at WRC.
Ericsson is grateful for the opportunity to provide comments in preparation for the Commission’s evaluation of the customs cooperation and mutual administrative assistance between the EU and China. Ericsson as a global telecom infrastructure company is active in markets on all continents and with R&D sites, production facilities, repair sites and offices located within both the EU and China, we are affected by how…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Ericsson next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 315.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Ericsson’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.