Beyond internal challenges, industrial decarbonisation faces significant external barriers that risk slowing progress. Two of the most critical are: 1) Lengthy and complex permitting procedures for energy infrastructure. As highlighted in both the Clean Industrial Deal and the Action Plan for Affordable Energy, permitting remains one of the greatest obstacles to expanding Europes energy infrastructure.
Energinet
Company · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 203401420540-78
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 171 other organisations on this site, they rank #17 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Energinet is member of ENTSO-E
- ENTSOG and ENNOH
- the European umbrella organisations for electricity
- gas and hydrogen TSOs (Transmission System Operators) respectively.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Head office
- Fredericia, Denmark
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Energinet in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Energinet? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Energinet filed 11 positions between 8 Mar 2021 and 12 Mar 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
Joint position on EU-UK electricity exchanges Feedback on the Extension of the scope of the carbon border adjustment mechanism to downstream products and anticircumvention measures – 08.2025 Unlocking the full potential of current and future electrical interconnections across the Channel and in the North Seas is vital to achieving the net zero objectives for both sides The EU and the UK share similar commitments and…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
General remarks Energinet welcomes the proposal from the European Commission (EC), noting that the market-based approach is largely maintained, that there is focus on establishing regulation for the future hydrogen market and that some efforts have been pointed towards green gasses.
GENERAL COMMENTS: Energinet would like to thank the EC for the timely initiative for a revision of the gas legislation and legislative proposals for regulation of hydrogen infrastructure. Ultimately, the gas legislation will be a crucial piece in the comprehensive regulatory puzzle, which should ensure deliverance on long term political targets for climate and energy throughout the entire European economy.
Energinet warmly welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the forthcoming Electrification Action Plan. The transition to a deeply electrified energy system is no longer optional it is essential.
Energinet welcomes the development of a new legislative initiative for the establishment of rules for an EU CO Market and Infrastructure. It is important to acknowledge that the CO market and related infrastructure remain at a very early stage of development, with significant uncertainty about how it will evolve.
Energinet generellay refer to the memo with our full consultation response, which is attached as separate file as instructed in the template. We support the efforts and consistency in translating the medium and long-term climate and energy targets and the Green Deal strategic framework to the sector legislation - including in the specific case of the TEN-E.
General remarks Energinet welcomes the European Commission’s proposal for an ambitious regulation to re-duce methane emissions across the energy sector of the EU. Limiting methane emissions is an important part of reaching the 2030 climate targets and Energinet supports that a unified ap-proach is established to put pressure on suppliers outside the EU, as a significant proportion of emissions through the supply…
REVISING THE EU ENERGY SECURITY FRAMEWORK: ADAPTING TO A CHANGING EUROPE Energinet appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to the Commissions call for evidence regarding the revision of the EU energy security framework. The Commissions revision is both timely and necessary.
General remarks: Energinet generally welcomes the package of proposals from the European Commission (EC), noting that the market-based approach is maintained, and that there is a focus on promoting green gasses and establishing regulation for the future hydrogen market.
Energinet welcomes the European Commissions initiative to simplify EU legislation governing energy-efficient products. Simplification and improved regulatory coherence are important to ensure that EU regulation supports the rapid expansion of Europes electricity infrastructure, which is essential for electrification, decarbonisation and energy security.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Energinet next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 293.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Energinet’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.