Public procurement in the power and heat production sector, as well as in the wholesale and retail electricity and gas sectors, has undergone significant changes since the first EU-wide regulation of the rules for the purchase of goods, services and works. The integration of markets and the strengthening of the Energy Union have contributed significantly to increased competition in the relevant markets.
CEZ Group
Company · Czechia · EU Transparency Register 310282849811-01
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #41 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- EURELECTRIC (through ČSZE)
- European Energy Forum (EEF)
- Energy Traders Europe →
- E.DSO - European Distribution System Operators AISBL
- Eurogas (through ČPS)
- Hospodářská komora České republiky (Czech Chamber of Commerce)
- nucleareurope →
- Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform (SNETP)
- Svaz energetiky ČR →
- World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO)
- World Nuclear Association (WNA)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- CEZ, a.s.
- Head office
- Praha 4, Czech republic
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track CEZ in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CEZ Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CEZ Group filed 10 positions between 4 Mar 2025 and 14 Apr 2026, across 10 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
The revision of the EU public procurement framework is timely and particularly relevant for the energy sector. Based on experience with the application of procurement directives, a revision of their scope is recommended, including the possible exclusion of the energy sector, sectoral contracting authorities, and/or specific production sources pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2014/25.
CEZ Group believes,there must be no reduction of GHG thresholds,as it would discourage investments that are necessary for transitioning toward a low-carbon economy (risk investing into possibly non-aligned project).In the proposal of the SP we lack appropriate reasoning of lowered thresholds and IA.Any proposal must be based on scientific/technical evidence to prove its feasibility,be supported by references.
Extending scope of CBAM from the view of power producers Energy sector is at the forefront of the EU decarbonization efforts, which is clear not only from so far reported emission reductions but also from the short-term future emission trajectories. That is why power producers cannot unconditionally support the extension of the CBAM scope downstream. If the energy transformation is about deploying low carbon (e.g.
CEZ Group welcomes many of the proposed changes, as they remove uncertainties and express the requirements, or relevant exemptions, more clearly in taxonomy. However, we also strongly believe that in many cases the changes were not improving the situation and in some Sections we are missing a corrective action by the EC altogether and CEZ Group would very much welcome, if EC would reconsider and make some…
The CEZ Group strongly believes the revision of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation should be in line with the decarbonisation policy objectives and support transition path of energy companies, which strive to lower the carbon footprint.
We support the European Commissions efforts to standardise and update the methodological framework for monitoring biomass sustainability. Based on practical experience, we identify several issues related to selected values and assumptions, including biomass import distance categories, default value increases, conversion efficiency and moisture content assumptions, and the proposed Cstor factor, which may create…
Dear all, CEZ Group welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft REMIT II Implementing Act and supports the aim of strengthening transparency and integrity, however we highlight that the proposal raises legal, operational, and technical concerns. Please find our response in the attachement. Best regards, CEZ Group
As part of the public consultation on the draft implementing legislation setting out minimum requirements for environmental sustainability for public procurement procedures, we would like to submit expert comments on the individual provisions of the submitted draft implementing regulation.
Comment on using the term metering point administrator We require to introduce the following definition of the delegated operator in Article 2 and to use this term alongside the term metering point administrator (i.e. to add the words or the delegated operator next to metering point administrator) in the provisions specified below.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 7 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 6 files in common
- Eurelectric · 6 files in common
- Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl · 6 files in common
- Transport & Environment · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 378.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CEZ Group’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.