Other · Czechia · EU Transparency Register 253480052808-83
8
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
8
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #191 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
Declares membership of
CEFIC: https://cefic.org/
Svaz průmyslu a dopravy České republiky: https://www.spcr.cz/
Platformy:
PLASTICS EUROPE: https://plasticseurope.org/
České technologické platformy PLASTY: https://www.tp-plasty.cz/
SUSCHEM: https://www.suschem.cz/
BIOPALIVA: https://www.biopaliva-ctpb.cz/
CO2: https://www.co2cz.com/cs/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Svaz chemického průmyslu České republiky, z.s. (SCHP ČR)
Head office
Praha, Czech republic
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Svaz chemického průmyslu ČR? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Svaz chemického průmyslu ČR filed 8 positions between 17 Mar 2025 and 11 Aug 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
The proposal builds on the EU’s efforts to develop the circular economy and digitalisation. In reality, its adoption will mean that large firms will have to invest in IT systems linked to state registries, which is likely to simplify their administrative processes in the long run.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
The Association of the Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic strongly disagrees with the lowering of benchmark values proposed by the European Commission. Limiting the volume of free allocation at a time when European industry is facing extremely difficult economic conditions will not primarily lead to technological transformation and emission reductions while maintaining production in Europe, but rather to the…
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Call for evidence: Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – downstream extension, anti-circumvention and rules on electricity emissions In general, we do not support the reduction of free allowances allocation, particularly due to the CBAM factor in strategic sectors, such as chemical production, including fertilizers.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
We are quite skeptical about recognizing carbon costs outside the EU due to the absolute disparity between the functioning of carbon charging in the EU and outside the EU. Even if a system outside the EU exists, we are unable to assess its relevance in a wider perspective.
We reject additional administrative and financial burdens for companies. DPP services must be legislatively dedicated to the EU and the national authorities. It is unacceptable to create requirements for the purchase of any services in connection with DPP by legislation, or to create a completely new market for DPP services ( Recital 3, 4, 14, hereinafter Art. 3). Art.
SCHP ČR has consistently advocated for the material recovery of plastic waste through chemical recycling methods, which we consider essential for achieving a circular economy. Without chemical recycling, it is impossible to ensure sufficient substitution of fossil raw materials and to promote the responsible use of plastics within the packaging, automotive, and other sectors.
The draft implementing regulation establishing the criteria under which plastic waste ceases to be waste and becomes a secondary raw material defines End of Waste (EoW) criteria (input material, processes, product quality), thereby supporting a unified market for recyclates.
The subject of the proposal is to reduce the PCB content in substances, mixtures and articles from 5 mg/kg to 0.2 mg/kg - we cannot agree with this in principle and the proposed reduction in the limit should be deleted. We request that the current limit be maintained. Justification: The proposed limit is not realistic.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Svaz chemického průmyslu ČR’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.