The European Steel Processors Association (ESPA) welcomes the European Commissions Regulation establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors: the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA).
European Steel Processors Association
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 450344351784-66
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #302 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Steel Processors Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Steel Processors Association filed 6 positions between 25 Aug 2025 and 12 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
The European Steel Processors Association (ESPA) welcomes the EUs efforts to strengthen the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) as a key tool to prevent carbon leakage and support the decarbonisation of the steel sector. ESPA supports extending CBAM to downstream products to address carbon leakage risks across the value chain and advocates for robust anti-circumvention measures to ensure effectiveness.
ESPA supports the objective of avoiding double carbon pricing on the same embedded emissions. Ensuring that genuine, mandatory and effectively paid carbon prices are recognised is essential to CBAMs environmental credibility and its proportionality as a climate measure.
Article 9(4) empowers the Commission to define rules for recognising foreign carbon prices. For ESPA, this provision is not a matter of trade defence, but an essential element to ensure that the CBAM remains an environmental instrument aimed at delivering a fair carbon cost signal.
Article 7(7) requires embedded emissions to be calculated according to harmonised rules; Article 9(4) demands that benchmarks used for adjustments mirror ETS; Article 10(2) ensures uniformity of conditions. These provisions form a legal obligation: CBAM cannot diverge from ETS logic. Actual values and defaults ESPA strongly supports that actual values, verified under ETS-consistent MRV systems, remain the rule.
Article 31(2) requires CBAM adjustments to mirror ETS allocation rules and to decline linearly with the ETS phase-out (20262034). Key principle: Transparency: Article 30(6) requires monitoring and reporting; benchmarks and datasets must be public and regularly revised.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 5 files in common
- ECOS · 5 files in common
- DigitalTrade4.EU · 5 files in common
- ArcelorMittal · 5 files in common
- CELSA Group · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 201.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Steel Processors Association’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.