The Circular Economy Act represents an opportunity to move beyond the EUs current fragmented waste policy and embed circularity as a core pillar of Europes industrial and climate strategy, creating the harmonised, predictable conditions needed for circular business models.
Sandbag
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 277895137794-73
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 126 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #11 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- We are members of Climate Action Network Europe.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Registered as
- Sandbag Climate Campaign
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Sandbag in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Sandbag? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Sandbag filed 9 positions between 8 Jul 2025 and 10 Jun 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 9 times.
What they argued
Labelling schemes are a source of debate with the proponents of each scheme claiming that the schemes either favour the ore-based or the scrap-based route of production. Without delving into the details of relative advantages of each labelling scheme, we recommend 4 principles and key criteria that should be included in any steel-related labelling scheme used to determine the incentives and support from EU and…
Sandbag welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation on the European Commissions proposed revision of the benchmark values of free allocation of emission allowances (2026-2030). This response to the Commissions public consultation outlines a sector-by-sector analysis of the Commissions proposal.
Sandbags recommendations: - For steel and aluminium, address scrap-related circumvention by either: Attributing emissions to both pre- and post-consumer scrap, and including scrap as a CBAM-covered input and applying country-level default values, or Using systematic default values - For cement: Apply systematic default values, to prevent resource reallocation without real emissions reductions - Improve indirect…
Sandbag welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation on the European Commissions proposed implementing regulation (IR), under the CBAM regulation, on the carbon price paid in third countries.
Article 9 of the CBAM Regulation stipulates that CBAM declarants may claim a reduction in the number of CBAM certificates to be surrendered in order to take into account the carbon price paid in the country of origin. The reduction may be claimed only if the carbon price has been effectively paid in the country of origin.
Our recommendations: - For steel and aluminium, Address scrap-related circumvention by either: o Attributing emissions to both pre- and post-consumer scrap, or o Using systematic default values - For cement, Apply systematic default values, to prevent resource reallocation without real emissions reductions - Improve indirect emissions accounting Either replace plant-level electricity emissions reporting with a…
We agree with the European Commissions general diagnosis that increasing the share of electricity in overall energy consumption is necessary to achieve deep decarbonisation. However, it is not sufficient. If overall energy use increases, or if electricity generation does not decarbonise rapidly, then electrification may fail its decarbonisation role.
The proposed approach using CBAM benchmarks is surprisingly complex. A different approach (which we had assumed as the obvious solution) would consist of simply mirroring the EU ETS. In the ETS, there is no such thing as a steel benchmark, so the allowances given for the production of steel are dispatched between individual process.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 8 files in common
- ECOS · 8 files in common
- Bellona Europa · 7 files in common
- Norsk Hydro · 7 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 6 files in common
Showing 5 of 402.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Sandbag’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.