Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 77947983421-21
12
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
11
legislative files
of 665 tracked
12
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at Nickel Institute? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Nickel Institute filed 12 positions between 6 Feb 2019 and 9 Sept 2026, across 11 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 12 times.
POSITION PAPER European Commission Proposed Critical Raw Materials Act Nickel Institute Position Introduction The Nickel Institute1 welcomes the European Commission’s proposal for a Critical Raw Materials Act, published on 16th March 2023. Nickel producers are at the beginning and at the end of important value chains for the EU´s future.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
COMMENTS EU CBAM Regulation public consultation on downstream scope extension, anti-circumvention measures, and rules on electricity emissions. Nickel Institute Comments 26th August 2025 Introduction The Nickel Institute 1 takes note of the public stakeholder consultation on the EU CBAM regulation on downstream scope extension, anti-circumvention measures, and rules on electricity emissions.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Nickel Institute welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on the future revision of EU rules for Food Contact Materials (FCMs). In our contribution, we are providing input on the following aspects: - Background: nickel and FCMs - General remarks - Specific comments on the IIA Background – Nickel and FCMs: About 70% of the global nickel production is used to…
The Nickel Institute takes note of the European Commission proposal for an EU battery regulation as published on 9th December 2020. Nickel producers are at the beginning and at the end of the battery value chain. Our member companies provide raw materials for battery technologies and recycle those once they reach the end of the life.
POSITION PAPER Revision of the EU Batteries Directive Nickel Institute Position July 2020 Introduction The Nickel Institute1 as the association representing the nickel industry in the EU and globally welcomes the Commission’s intention to revise the EU Batteries Directive and create a new regulatory framework for batteries.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Nickel Institute is the global association of leading primary nickel producers. We advocate for the responsible supply of nickel and the sustainable development of the nickel industry. The Environmental Omnibus is a significant step in the right direction toward achieving a more competitive EU mining industry.
The Nickel Institute as association the nickel industry takes note of the Annex to the Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries as published in May 2024.
The Nickel Institute supports the European Commission's objective of improving the environmental sustainability and circularity of iron and steel products under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). Steel is fundamental to the EU's industrial competitiveness, strategic autonomy and decarbonisation ambitions.
14 March 2023 Nickel Institute’s feedback on the revision of the Nickel Environmental Quality Standards The Nickel Institute1 (NI) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed revision of the Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) Directive and the freshwater nickel EQS. The NI does not support the revised EQS values proposed by the Commission and has the following remarks on process.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The Nickel Institute provides feedback on the European Commission's draft regulation regarding the methodology for calculating and verifying recycled content in batteries, focusing on cobalt, nickel, lithium, and lead. The comments aim to ensure that the regulation is practical and supportive of existing recycling efforts without imposing unnecessary bureaucracy.
The Nickel Institute as industry association representing the interests of nickel producers welcomes the European Commission´s inception impact assessment which was launched on 9th January 2019 as part of the better regulation agenda and the Strategic Action plan of the EC´s Batteries Alliance in view of sustainability requirements for batteries.
The Nickel Institute welcomes the Commission proposal to revise the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive 2004/37/EC (CMD, 4th batch) and set EU binding Occupational Exposure Limit values (OELVs) for additional substances, including nickel compounds.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Nickel Institute next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Nickel Institute’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.