Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CEM

CEMEP

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 779609618363-91

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #495 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • http://www.orgalim.eu

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
European Committee of Manufacturers of Electrical Machines and Power Electronics (CEMEP)
Head office
Bruxelles, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track CEMEP in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at CEMEP? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files CEMEP engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from CEMEP or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

CEMEP filed 3 positions between 25 Aug 2025 and 11 Aug 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresfiled 25 Aug 2025PDFsource

The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is fundamentally pursuing the right goal: climate protection by preventing carbon leakage. In its current form, however, the CBAM fails to achieve this goal, and at the same time jeopardizes the international competitiveness of European industry. Discussions about extending CBAM to downstream steel and aluminum products miss the point.

Ecodesign requirements for iron and steel productsfiled 11 Aug 2026source

CEMEP supports European measures aimed at increasing demand for low-carbon steel and accelerating the decarbonisation of the steel industry. However, this transition must be designed in a way that the competitiveness of the entire European value chain, including downstream industries such as electric motor manufacturing.

Review ecodesign electric motors and variable speed drives.filed 22 Sept 2025PDFsource

CEMEP emphasises the need for regulation at the system level to maximise energy savings and support the European Unions climate objectives, while welcoming the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation as an opportunity to realise the considerable energy saving potential of motors.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 24.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from CEMEP’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.