Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2025/0359(COD) · In Force

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)

853 submissions from 628 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 956 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 853 from organizations. Not shown: 99 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 4 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee LIBERapporteur Axel Voss (EPP)
  1. Publication in the Official Journal · 25 Jul 2026
  2. Published in the Official Journal · 24 Jul 2026
  3. Signature by the President of the EP and by the President of the Council · 8 Jul 2026
  4. Signed · 8 Jul 2026
  5. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 29 Jun 2026

Who showed up

596 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 129 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 4.6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 596Civil society 129Public authorities, academia, other 127

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice. An identical text filed by several organizations counts once: 1 submission here repeats one text word for word and is folded into it.

What the room declares

415 of 628
in the EU Register
1,747
full-time lobbying staff
€252.9M+
declared costs a year
1105
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 15 Mar 2026 — it ran from 24 Nov 2025.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
LIBE
Rapporteur
Axel Voss (EPP)
Commission reference
COM(2025)836

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence14 Oct 2025
  2. Proposal for a regulation13 Mar 2026
  3. Proposal for a regulation15 Mar 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 250 submissions on this page · page 1 of 4 · 853 across the file. Search the whole file

DD

Datenanfragen.de e. V.

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Please see our comments on the proposed Digital Omnibus for the GDPR and ePrivacy Directive from the perspective of a consumer and civil rights non-profit that helps people exercise their right to data protection in the attached PDF.

LinkedInX
ZD

Zentralverband der deutschen Werbewirtschaft e.V.

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Digital Omnibus-VO: Vorschläge, Folgen, Änderungsvorschläge Stellungnahme zum Vorschlag der Kommission COM (2025) 837 final vom 19.11.2025 I Neue Rechtsgrundlagen – und deren Bedeutung für die digitale Wirtschaft Der Vorschlag für die Digital Omnibus-Verordnung („Omnibus“) bezweckt, datenregulierende Rechtsvorschriften zu vereinfachen und zu konsolidieren.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
FI

Free ICT Europe Foundation

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Free ICT Europe welcome the call to contribute to the European Commissions consultation on the Digital Omnibus Initiative. Our response highlights how simplification can strengthennot weakenEuropes digital sovereignty, the circular economy, and the competitiveness of SMEs and Small MidCaps active in the ICT aftermarket.

LinkedInX
SL

Syntonym Limited

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Syntonym welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed amendments to the GDPR within the Digital Omnibus package. As a developer of privacy-preserving technologies for camera-collected data and visual AI systems, Syntonym focuses its comments on two elements of the proposal that will significantly affect the governance of visual data and AI development: (1) the proposed amendment to the definition of…

LinkedInX
PN

Privacy Next SRL

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Privacy Next Feedback on the Digital Omnibus Proposal COM(2025)837 Introduction 1. The European Commission’s Digital Omnibus proposal comes at a time when the regional organisation and its Member States are pursuing a range of policy priorities competitiveness, simplification, better enforcement, increased cooperation, and more efficiency are all identified as necessary matters to address.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
GA

German AI Association (Bundesverband Künstliche Intelligenz)

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

We welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commissions consultation on the Digital Omnibus on Data. Please find attached the German AI Associations (KI Bundesverband) feedback outlining our assessment of the proposed amendments and recommendations to support responsible AI development while ensuring strong data protection safeguards.

LinkedInX
EA

European AI Forum

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The EAIF welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commissions consultation on the Digital Omnibus on Data. Please find attached the European AI Forums feedback outlining our assessment of the proposed amendments and recommendations to ensure a coherent, proportionate and innovation-compatible data protection framework for AI development in Europe.

LinkedInX
AS

AI Sweden, Lindholmen Science Park

· · filed 15 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

2026-03-15 Ref. Ares(2026)2788231 - 15/03/2026 AI Sweden’s comments on the Digital Omnibus AI Sweden is the Swedish national center for applied artificial intelligence. Our mission is to accelerate the use of AI for the benefit of our society, our competitiveness, and for everyone living in Sweden. We are broadly funded and not for profit, as a part of Lindholmen Science Park.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX

The National Bar of Attorneys-at-Law represents nearly 60,000 of attorneys-at-law in Poland. With regard to the role of the self-government of attorneys-at-law as a profession of public trust entrusted with the protection of individual rights and the public interest, we would like to draw the attention to the practical implications of the proposed Digital Omnibus package.

LinkedInX
TT

TikTok Technology Limited

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

TikTok Feedback on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Digital Omnibus Executive summary We are supportive of the European Commission’s commitment to reducing the administrative burden of EU regulation, including through simplification, and enhancing European competitiveness.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
DH

Dedalus Healthcare

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Dedalus welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the European Commissions Digital Omnibus proposal. As a European leader in Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and AIenabled medical devices (MDAI), serving large hospital networks across the Union, Dedalus strongly supports the objective of creating a predictable, innovationfriendly, and clinically safe digital regulatory environment.

LinkedInX
AA

AI Accountability Lab (AIAL), Trinity College Dublin

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

We welcome the Commission's proposals on simplifying the regulations. However, we consider several aspects as being problematic, and therefore do not recommend accepting them at this stage. We summarise our views in the provided document as follows: (1) Definition of Personal Data: should be rejected as it drastically changes the scope of the GDPR, affects its rights, and has a material impact on the fundamental…

LinkedInX
AC

AI Chamber

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

AI Chamber Submission on the European Commission’s “Digital Omnibus” package AI Chamber welcomes the direction the European Commission has taken with the proposed “Digital Omnibus” package. We see it as a necessary step toward reducing regulatory friction in Europe’s digital economy.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
C

CrowdStrike

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

CrowdStrike welcomes the opportunity to respond to the European Commission's Call for Feedback on the Digital Omnibus Proposal (COM(2025)837). As a leading global cybersecurity provider delivering AI-powered, cloud-native protection to enterprises worldwide, we strongly support the Commission's objective to simplify the EU digital rulebook while maintaining high standards.

LinkedInX
C

CrowdStrike

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

CrowdStrike appreciates the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the Digital Omnibus on AI and welcomes the Commissions efforts to streamline implementation of the AI Act in a way that improves legal certainty and reduces unnecessary administrative burden while preserving high levels of safety, security, and fundamental rights protection.

LinkedInX
AF

Austrian Federation of Social Insurances

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

The Austrian Social Insurance welcomes the European Commissions proposals for simplifying and streamlining data protection and processing governance in order to guarantee a timely, smooth and efficient enforcement of certain provisions of the AI Act as well as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

LinkedInX
CA

Credo AI

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Credo AI's submission makes a single, sustained argument. The EU AI Act's normative foundations are sound and should not be reopened, but the regulatory architecture built around them is operationally fragmented in ways that will predictably undermine the Act's protective objectives unless the Omnibus intervenes decisively. Simplification is not a neutral concept.

LinkedInX
JJ

Johnson & Johnson

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

Fostering regulatory coherence and legal certainty is essential to safeguard high standards of healthcare quality and patient safety, while enabling innovation in the medical sector. We welcome the establishment of a single-entry point for cybersecurity incident reporting via ENISA: incidents with patient safety implications that qualify as MDR vigilance events should continue to be reported through established…

LinkedInX
JJ

Johnson & Johnson

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

As one of the worlds leading scientific innovation companies, Johnson & Johnson views the AI Omnibus as a critical opportunity to preserve and reinforce recent regulatory improvements, while ensuring that the EUs AI framework delivers regulatory coherence and legal certainty. This is essential to safeguard high standards of healthcare quality and patient safety, while enabling innovation in the medical sector.

LinkedInX
E

Eurocities

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Eurocities welcomes this opportunity to contribute to the European Commission's call for evidence on the adoption of a Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI). Please find our input below.

LinkedInX
PG

Prighter Group

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Executive Summary Prighter welcomes the European Commissions initiative to simplify the digital regulatory framework and reduce administrative burdens, particularly for SMEs and the newly introduced category of small mid-cap companies (SMCs). Our submission focuses on the practical applicability of the proposed changes.

LinkedInX
PG

Prighter Group

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

Executive Summary Prighter welcomes the Commissions Digital Omnibus proposal as a meaningful step towards simplifying the AI regulatory framework and reducing administrative burdens across the Single Market. Drawing upon feedback from our clients, including SMEs and non-EU-providers, Prighters assessment is grounded in the practical operability of the proposed changes.

LinkedInX
AA

AEPO-ARTIS

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

AEPO-ARTIS POSITION ON THE DIGITAL OMNIBUS AEPO-ARTIS is a non-profit organisation that represents 42 European performers collective management organisations (CMOs) from 30 European countries. The number of performers from the music and audiovisual sectors represented by our members can be estimated at 650.000.

LinkedInX
CO

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation. For ease of reference, our detailed responses and recommendations are set out in the attached. The omnibus proposals must not stand alone but should be the first in a series of reforms. SN is pleased to see the Commissions committed to further simplification initiatives via the Digital Fitness Check.

LinkedInX
EC

European CMP Association

· · filed 13 Mar 2026 · source

PDF

The European CMP Association represents Consent Management Platform (CMP) providers operating across the European Union. Our members work closely with a wide range of organisations across Europe, from small businesses to large online services, that rely on consent management solutions to implement privacy choices and comply with EU data protection rules.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 853 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.