Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 144475251095-14
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #339 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at European AI Forum? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European AI Forum filed 2 positions between 30 Sept 2025 and 25 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Brussels, 30th of September 2025 Consultation Statement by the European AI Forum (EAIF) on: 28th Regime: A Single Harmonized Set of Rules for Innovative Companies Throughout the EU We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the consultation by the European Commission on its upcoming proposal of a 28th Regime.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The European AI Forum (EAIF), representing 14 national AI associations and more than 3,000 members across the EU, submits this response to the Commission's Call for Evidence on the review of the CDSM Directive. We welcome this timely review, which arrives at a critical juncture: the deployment of General Purpose AI (GPAI) models has exposed significant interpretive gaps in Articles 3 and 4 CDSM, creating legal…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from European AI Forum’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.