Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CLU

Civil Liberties Union for Europe

NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 544892227334-39

10
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
9
legislative files
of 665 tracked
10
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #129 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Liberties is not a member of any federations or networks.

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Berlin, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Civil in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Civil Liberties Union for Europe

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Civil Liberties Union for Europe? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Civil Liberties Union for Europe filed 10 positions between 30 Jun 2020 and 13 Mar 2026, across 9 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 10 times.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 2 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 3 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 14 Oct 2025PDFsource

The digital omnibus simplification process poses grave risks to fundamental rights and EU values. We are greatly concerned that it will result in weakened fundamental rights protections and widened loopholes in the name of competitiveness. Such an approach risks undoing years of progress achieved through landmark EU legislation such as the GDPR, the DSA, and the AI Act.

Artificial Intelligence Actfiled 14 Jul 2021PDFsource

The Civil Liberties Union for Europe (www.liberties.eu) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the AI Regulation proposal. We recognize that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can contribute positively to our societies. But AI systems can also undermine our fundamental rights, by perpetuating bias in criminal justice, manipulating public opinion and enabling mass surveillance practices.

Digital Fairness Actfiled 24 Oct 2025PDFsource

The Digital Fairness Act (DFA) is a defining opportunity to bring fairness to digital environments shaped by monetised attention and algorithmic amplification. Liberties draws attention to a growing form of commercialised political influence that falls outside both the DSA and the TTPA: influencer-driven and platform-monetised political content.

Digital Services Actfiled 30 Mar 2021PDFsource

The Civil Liberties Union for Europe submits its position to give feedback to the European Commission about the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act). See the attachment in pdf.

Digital Markets Actfiled 30 Jun 2020PDFsource

Brussels, 30 June 2020 Joint statement in response to the inception impact assessments on a new competition tool ex ante regulatory instrument for large online platforms acting as gatekeepers We are pleased to see that the European Commission is reviewing its regulatory toolbox in response to the challenges posed by large online platforms in numerous digital markets, and we welcome the possibility to provide…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Digital Fitness Checkfiled 11 Mar 2026PDFsource

Liberties welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Digital Fitness Check Communication. However, it is unfortunate that this opportunity only comes after the digital omnibus proposals were launched in November 2025.

Combating child sexual abuse onlinefiled 12 Sept 2022PDFsource

On 11 May 2022, the European Commission published a Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse (Proposal). The Proposal would oblige online platforms, including hosting, interpersonal communications and other service providers, to scan user’s content and/or metadata, and report, remove, and/or block already known and new online…

General Data Protection Regulation: additional procedural rules relating to the enforcement of the Regulationfiled 24 Mar 2023PDFsource

The Civil Liberties Union for Europe (hereinafter Liberties) welcomes the European Commissions initiative aimed at further specifying procedural rules relating to the enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter GDPR). Liberties an EU-level watchdog and network organisation representing 19 human rights organisations from 18 Member States.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Civil Liberties Union for Europe next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 307.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Civil Liberties Union for Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.