To whom it may concern, I am writing top submit the comments of the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE). These comments are organised as follows. Section II addresses the need for methodological rigour in the Fitness Check, including the assessment of indirect effects, the gap between projected and actual compliance costs, and the problem of last-minute legislative additions that bypass the impact-…
ICL
International Center for Law & Economics
Academic / research · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 774288494402-02
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 126 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #38 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Head office
- Portland, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track International in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at International Center for Law & Economics? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
International Center for Law & Economics filed 3 positions between 2 Oct 2025 and 11 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The stated objectives of the EU Space Act are commendable: laying down a coherent framework to foster innovation, ensure trackability of space objects, reduce space debris, tailor a cybersecurity framework for space infrastructure, and create a common method to assess environmental impact.
To whom it may concern, Please find attached the International Center for Law & Economics comments on the Commissions consultation concerning the revision of Regulation 1/2003. In brief, our comments counsel preserving strong evidentiary and proportionality safeguards for interim measures and commitments; streamlining complainant procedures by removing the obligation to issue formal rejection decisions; and…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) · 3 files in common
- ACT | The App Association · 2 files in common
- Chamber of Progress · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from International Center for Law & Economics’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.