FiCom welcomes the Commissions aim to simplify EU digital regulation. Clear and predictable rules are essential, but simplification must be practical: it should genuinely reduce administrative burden, remove overlaps and avoid shifting uncertainty from one instrument to another. The final outcome must support effective implementation for organisations of all sizes.
FiCom ry
Industry association · Finland · EU Transparency Register 29762326480-22
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #691 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- EuroIspa https://www.ispa.org.uk/policy/euroispa/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Helsinki, Finland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track FiCom in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FiCom ry? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
FiCom ry filed 6 positions between 22 Nov 2017 and 12 Mar 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
FiCom welcomes the Commissions effort to address practical implementation challenges of the AI Act. The adjustments are useful, but they must not introduce new uncertainty or leave companies unsure which obligations apply. The framework must remain predictable, technically workable and proportionate for organisations of all sizes.
The EU has finally taken the right direction: digital regulation is being simplified through omnibus initiatives. This is essential. For example, the current regulatory framework for telecommunications has become far too complex compared to the pace of technological development. Legislation must keep up with the times and promote Europes competitiveness, not hinder it.
FiCom's comments are in the attached statement. However, here are FiCom's main messages: FiCom emphasizes the importance of simplifying, harmonizing, and ensuring fairness in regulation. The current regulatory framework is complex and does not adequately respond to market and technological changes. FiCom supports reducing reporting obligations and eliminating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Please see the attached file for all comments. Some key points: The white paper provides a fairly good overview of the communication markets and their associated challenges at the EU level. FiCom supports simplification, harmonization, and fairness in regulation.
Finnish Federation for Communications and Teleinformatics, FiCom is a co-operation organisation for the ICT industry in Finland. FiCom's members are companies and other entities that operate in the communications and teleinformatics sector in Finland. FiCom makes the following submission on assessment on regulation of the platforms.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put FiCom ry next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 164.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FiCom ry’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.