Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EUR

Eurosmart

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 358126150252-49

5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #443 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • European Telecommunications Standards Institute - ETSI (European Standardisation organisation) https://www.etsi.org/a…
  • Bureau de Normalisation - NBN (Belgian standardisation organisation) https://www.nbn.be/en
  • European Internet Forum (EIF) https://www.internetforum.eu/
  • EU Common Criteria Information Sharing and Analysis Centre (EUCC ISAC) https://www.ccisac.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Eurosmart in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Eurosmart? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Eurosmart engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Eurosmart or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Eurosmart filed 5 positions between 17 Jan 2025 and 12 May 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.

2025 · 3 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Amending the NIS 2 Directive as regards simplification measures and alignment with the Cybersecurity Act 2filed 20 Jun 2025PDFsource

Eurosmart supports a focused revision of the EU Cybersecurity Act (CSA) to strengthen ENISAs role, preserve the integrity of the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework (ECCF), and streamline certification. The CSA remains central to the EUs cybersecurity framework, and its alignment with other regulations (e.g., CRA, NIS2, AI Act) is essential to reduce duplication and simplify compliance.

Digitalisation of identity cards issued to EU citizensfiled 17 Jan 2025PDFsource

Eurosmart welcomes the proposal to digitalize national identity cards, enhancing free movement within the EU/SAC Area and leveraging the EUDI Wallet introduced by the amendment to the eIDAS Regulation. However, Eurosmart identifies the following comments: 1.Security Aspects: The proposal lacks clarity on Digital Travel Credentials (DTCs) security aspects.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 20.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Eurosmart’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.