Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EUR

Eurosmart

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 358126150252-49

18
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
12
legislative files
of 665 tracked
18
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #268 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • European Telecommunications Standards Institute - ETSI (European Standardisation organisation) https://www.etsi.org/a…
  • Bureau de Normalisation - NBN (Belgian standardisation organisation) https://www.nbn.be/en
  • European Internet Forum (EIF) https://www.internetforum.eu/
  • EU Common Criteria Information Sharing and Analysis Centre (EUCC ISAC) https://www.ccisac.eu/

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Eurosmart in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Eurosmart

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Eurosmart? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Eurosmart filed 18 positions between 4 Mar 2019 and 12 May 2026, across 12 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 18 times.

2019 · 1 filed2020 · 2 filed2021 · 3 filed2022 · 3 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 4 filed

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 14 Oct 2025PDFsource

While Eurosmart welcomes the Commissions work on the Digital Omnibus, we note with concern that the current Call for Evidence appears to narrow the initial ambition of this initiative. The Omnibus was originally conceived as a bold and strategic exercise to streamline Europes increasingly complex digital regulatory landscape and to remove inconsistencies between key legislative acts.

Artificial Intelligence Actfiled 29 Jul 2021PDFsource

Eurosmart, the Voice of the Digital Security Industry, welcomes the Commission’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. Our association has been advocating for years for EU requirements covering AI systems.

Amending the NIS 2 Directive as regards simplification measures and alignment with the Cybersecurity Act 2filed 20 Jun 2025PDFsource

Eurosmart supports a focused revision of the EU Cybersecurity Act (CSA) to strengthen ENISAs role, preserve the integrity of the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework (ECCF), and streamline certification. The CSA remains central to the EUs cybersecurity framework, and its alignment with other regulations (e.g., CRA, NIS2, AI Act) is essential to reduce duplication and simplify compliance.

European data governance (Data Governance Act)filed 29 Jan 2021PDFsource

Eurosmart, the Voice of the Digital Security Industry, welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a Data Governance Act. This proposal is instrumental to develop the European research and industry in the field of AI. Ultimately, it should strengthen Europe’s AI value chain, and hence its strategic autonomy. However, Eurosmart has a few recommendations to improve the content of the proposed legislation.

Cyber Resilience Actfiled 23 Jan 2023PDFsource

Over the last decade, the European Union has been developing a solid cybersecurity regulatory approach. The overall approach is to make the European market more resilient while ensuring the digital sovereignty of the whole continent. This trend has prioritized sensitive domains that deserve strong resilience to more and more skilled attackers.

Cyber Resilience Actfiled 25 May 2022PDFsource

Eurosmart fully supports the CRA general objective but would recommend a scalable approach for both hardware and software products. The CRA should clearly define the type of products falling under its scope since the market access and market surveillance rules are closely bound with liability.

A high common level of cybersecurityfiled 13 Aug 2020PDFsource

The NIS Directive has been instrumental in increasing the cyber-resilience of the EU. As the first piece of legislation concerning EU-wide cybersecurity, the NIS Directive is the acknowledgment that incidents in one Member State can have significant cross-border impacts, hence requiring a common level of cybersecurity throughout the EU.

Liability for defective productsfiled 9 Dec 2022PDFsource

The Product Liability Directive has proven its value during the past three decades to ensure the victims right to compensation, even without fault on the part of the producer (strict liability). This directive oversees significant aspects of the European Single Market; it complements the safety requirements for placing a product on the Market with the right to compensation in case a product is still defective, i.e.

European Digital Identity frameworkfiled 2 Sept 2021PDFsource

Eurosmart, the Voice of the Digital Security Industry, would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to comment on the proposal for a Regulation establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity. Our recommendations can be found in the attached document.

European Digital Identity frameworkfiled 3 Sept 2020PDFsource

Option 1: Eurosmart supports option 1 as a necessary step to consolidate the eIDAS framework. Further enhancements and extended usages of eIDs under eIDAS should be fostered. In particular, deeper harmonisation of certifications will bring more confidence and trust to stakeholders. This will also clarify the eIDAS security requirements and Levels of Assurance (LoAs).

Issuance of and technical standards for digital travel credentials based on identity cardsfiled 17 Jan 2025PDFsource

Eurosmart welcomes the proposal to digitalize national identity cards, enhancing free movement within the EU/SAC Area and leveraging the EUDI Wallet introduced by the amendment to the eIDAS Regulation. However, Eurosmart identifies the following comments: 1.Security Aspects: The proposal lacks clarity on Digital Travel Credentials (DTCs) security aspects.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Eurosmart next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 287.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Eurosmart’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.