Industry association · Poland · EU Transparency Register 225098399408-60
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #126 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track AI in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at AI Chamber? so we know who speaks for it.
AI Chamber filed 5 positions between 24 Oct 2025 and 11 Sept 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
AI Chamber Submission on the European Commission’s “Digital Omnibus” package AI Chamber welcomes the direction the European Commission has taken with the proposed “Digital Omnibus” package. We see it as a necessary step toward reducing regulatory friction in Europe’s digital economy.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
AI Chamber’s Position on the AI Strategy for the Cultural and Creative Sectors AI Chamber supports the development of a European strategy that combines the advancement of artificial intelligence with the protection of creators and the strengthening of cultural diversity. AI can support content creation, translation and dissemination, heritage preservation, and the development of new services.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
AI Chamber CEE provides comments on the European Open Digital Ecosystem Strategy, with particular attention to the implications for innovation and the competitiveness of SMEs. An open digital ecosystem (open source) should be treated as an instrument of the EUs strategic digital autonomy rather than merely a technical choice.
As the AI Chamber, representing innovators and businesses in the Central and Eastern European artificial intelligence sector, we submit our attached position on the proposed Digital Fairness Act (DFA). We believe this legislative initiative, while in many respects well-intentioned, is fundamentally misguided.
The Digital Fitness Check should focus on the cumulative cost of compliance, not on single acts in isolation. The core problem for European businesses is the overlap of obligations under GDPR, the AI Act, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and sector-specific regimes.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put AI Chamber next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 189.
Everything on this page comes from AI Chamber’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.