Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
AC

AI Chamber

Industry association · Poland · EU Transparency Register 225098399408-60

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #139 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
5
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
AI CHAMBER
Head office
Warszawa, Poland

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track AI in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at AI Chamber? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files AI Chamber engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from AI Chamber or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

AI Chamber filed 2 positions between 3 Feb 2026 and 11 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

European Open Digital Ecosystemsfiled 3 Feb 2026source

AI Chamber CEE provides comments on the European Open Digital Ecosystem Strategy, with particular attention to the implications for innovation and the competitiveness of SMEs. An open digital ecosystem (open source) should be treated as an instrument of the EUs strategic digital autonomy rather than merely a technical choice.

Digital Fitness Checkfiled 11 Mar 2026source

The Digital Fitness Check should focus on the cumulative cost of compliance, not on single acts in isolation. The core problem for European businesses is the overlap of obligations under GDPR, the AI Act, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and sector-specific regimes.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 11.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from AI Chamber’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.