Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CA

Credo AI

Company · United States · EU Transparency Register 273042693385-29

1
position filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1161 companies & groups on this site, they rank #864 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Partnership on AI (https://partnershiponai.org/)
  • International Association of Privacy Professionals (https://iapp.org/)
  • National Conference of State Legislatures (https://www.ncsl.org/)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Los Altos, United states

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Credo in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Credo AI? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Credo AI engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Credo AI or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Credo AI filed 1 position on 13 Mar 2026, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 13 Mar 2026PDFsource

Credo AI's submission makes a single, sustained argument. The EU AI Act's normative foundations are sound and should not be reopened, but the regulatory architecture built around them is operationally fragmented in ways that will predictably undermine the Act's protective objectives unless the Omnibus intervenes decisively. Simplification is not a neutral concept.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Credo AI next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Credo AI’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.