Match Groups position on the Digital Omnibus advocates for a risk-based EU regulatory framework that distinguishes between intrusive biometric surveillance and targeted "liveness" verification used for user safety as part of the GDPR simplification. The policy recommendations aim to reconcile modern privacy standards with the evolving reality of online fraud.
MG
Match Group
Company · Belgium
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Match in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Match Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Match Group filed 3 positions between 30 Jun 2020 and 13 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Match Group welcomes the plans of the European Commission to clarify responsibilities for digital services and improve user safety online. The online dating services of Match Group, which include Tinder, Meetic and OkCupid, are peer-to-peer match-making services, which aim at connecting people rather than enabling one-to-many content sharing or generating transactions.
Match Group’s welcome the opportunity to provide feedback (see attacehd) to the European Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on a regulation to fight child sexual abuse. This document outlines Match Group’s experience and perspective with regards to combating child exploitation, and the EU legislation that is needed to facilitate our continuing efforts.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Match Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 81.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Match Group’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.