Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 022953398537-95
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #174 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Declares membership of
NDM är en av huvudmännen bakom den svenska självregleringen inom reklam Reklamombudsmannen www.reklamombudsmannen.org
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
Näringslivets Delegation för Marknadsrätt (NDM)
Head office
Stockholm, Sweden
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
NDM filed 4 positions between 14 Oct 2025 and 13 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
NDM response to the Digital omnibus NDM is grateful for the opportunity to respond to the Commission’s consultation on the Digital Omnibus on the need to reform of the EU’s digital legislation. The Stockholm-based NDM (a Confederation of Swedish Business Organisations) comprises 24 Swedish industry and interest organisations from various sectors.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
To the European Commission, DG Connect Dear Madam, Dear Sir, NDM would like to thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence for the Digital Omnibus. As we have already submitted input to the Commission regarding the need to review the role of the EDPB as part of a forthcoming evaluation of the GDPR, we would like to use this Call for Evidence to highlight the importance of including the…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
New detailed legislation risks being less effective than active enforcement of existing rules While we share the view that many of the issues raised in the consultation are important from a consumer-protection perspective, our assessment is that virtually all of these areas are already covered by existing legislation (see attached table).
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
NDM is grateful for the opportunity to respond to the Commissions consultation on the Digital Fitness Check on the need to reform of the EUs digital legislation. The Stockholm-based NDM (a Confederation of Swedish Business Organisations) comprises 24 Swedish industry and interest organisations from various sectors.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put NDM next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from NDM’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.