Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals

194 submissions from 185 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 1,097 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 194 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

131 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 34 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.9 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 131Civil society 34Public authorities, academia, other 29

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

100 of 185
in the EU Register
590
full-time lobbying staff
€72.2M+
declared costs a year
428
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 15 Apr 2022 — it ran from 20 Jan 2022.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2025

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep1 Jun 2021
  2. Public consultation15 Apr 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Proposal for a regulation.

Showing 25 of 194 submissions.

AS

Aludec S.A.

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

Aludec S.A. as a chemical user company wishes to assess very positively the proposed revision of the REACH regulation. We appreciate and support any initiative from the European Union aimed at better protecting the health of European citizens and protecting the environment.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
G

GLOBAL 2000

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

An addendum from GLOBAL 2000: The 0.1 % limit for SVHCs is too high for many substances, such as endocrine disruptors or carcinogenic substances. It is well known that EDCS can be harmful even in the lowest doses, often even more harmful than in higher doses. Therefore, there should be no 0.1 % limit, but SVHCs should have to be declared IMMER.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EF

EDC-Free Europe coalition

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

EDC-Free Europe coalition welcomes the EC plans for the revision of REACH so that the Regulation fully delivers on its objectives to ensure a high level of protection for human health & the environment, and on the commitments of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). Inadequate control of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) under REACH is one of the crucial areas of concerns.

LinkedInX
G

GLOBAL 2000

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

Thank you for the opportunity to make proposals to improve REACH. Global 2000, the Austrian environmental protection organisation, sees the following potential improvements for REACH: Article 33 should be revised: — Companies have to reply IMMER to consumer-Inn enquiries, even if no SVHC is included (otherwise, consumer does not know whether companies simply did not reply, if query was lost, etc.) — time limit of 45…

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GT

Green Transition Denmark (GTD) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission’s discussions of the revision of EU’s REACH chemicals regulation. GTD is a Danish NGO working to promote a green and sustainable transition of society. We have many years of experience with the chemicals area and have especially focus on endocrine disrupters and other areas that are not covered by the REACH legislation.

LinkedInX
CF

Cruelty Free Europe

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

Cruelty Free Europe sees the revision of REACH as an opportunity to move towards a modern EU regulatory system for chemicals based on non-animal methods. This would end the suffering of millions of animals and address citizens’ concerns while providing better information on chemicals for human health and the environment.

LinkedInX
CM

Coalition (23 members)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

The 23 organisations forming this Coalition share a view on how the essential use concept (EUC) can be introduced in a way that will tackle actual risks and not slow down the regulatory process or lead to unintended, regrettable substitution.

LinkedInX
EF

European Federation of Essential Oils (E.F.E.O.)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

EFEO response to the Inception Impact Assessment on the revision of the REACH regulation The European Federation of Essential Oils (EFEO) supports the objectives of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) and welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Inception Impact Assessments (IIA) on the revision of the REACH regulation.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
TC

TÉCNICO DEPARTAMENTO GRUPO CROPU

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

As downstream users of chemicals, we want to assess positively the REACH review initiative. We consider that if the stated objectives are met, there would be an improvement in the health of workers and users of chemicals and of the environment in general.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
SL

Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto (The Finnish Association for Nature Conservation)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto (The Finnish Association for Nature Conservation) is the oldest and biggest environmental NGO. We think that the quality of chemicals safety information in REACH documentation especially with regard to environmental safety, but even to health effects, is varying and in many cases very poor.

LinkedInX
TA

The Association of Lithuanian Chemical Industry Enterprises

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

The Association of Lithuanian chemical industry enterprises welcomes the opportunity to express views for REACH Revision Inception Assessment public consultation. Chemical sector in the country is already facing a transition which comprise climate neutrality, digitalization, circularity objectives and implementation of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.

LinkedInX
IP

Impresa privata

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

The desire to protect and safeguard human health and the environment in which we live can only be a shared objective on the part of everyone with common sense. However, we perceive that the diverse mechanisms contained in European regulations, aimed at generalising, often give rise to interpretations, and do not take sufficient account of the specificities and operational needs of many sectors, especially with…

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ME

MedTech Europe

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

MedTech Europe, the European trade association for the medical technology industry welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the upcoming revision of the Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH Regulation). We look forward to continuing to engage in this and other policy initiatives within the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.

LinkedInX
BF

BUND (Friends of the earth Germany)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

Friends of the Earth Germany (BUND) welcomes the possibility to comment on the IIA REACH revision. Regularly performing product testing to check for REACH compliance and encouraging consumers to use their right to know (Article 33), BUND sees the urgency for action, regarding enforcement of REACH compliance and revising Article 33. Please see our further remarks in attached document.

LinkedInX

The Zero Pollution Action Plan under the EU Green Deal rightfully focuses on the prevention of pollution first, based on the precautionary principle; principles enshrined in the TFEU. The prevention of pollution at the source has to include accelerated, concrete action under the REACH Regulation to prevent harmful substances from negatively impacting surface and ground water quality, including drinking water…

LinkedInX
SF

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

As an environmental scientist I support the goals of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability to propose new hazard classes and criteria within REACH. Endocrine, disruption, persistence and mobility should be included as novel hazard classes. Further, data availability should be improved to check the compliance and effectiveness of the regulation.

LinkedInX
AF

Airlines for Europe (A4E)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

To whom it may concern Protecting human health and the environment while making use of hazardous chemicals is of utmost importance to A4E members. That is why we support the objectives of the REACh Regulation, and welcome its revision to ensure an even better protection of human health and the environment. We appreciate the opportunity to participate in this revision process.

LinkedInX
HS

Humane Society International/Europe

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

Humane Society International (HSI) welcomes this opportunity to comment on the Inception Impact Assessment – Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals. By ensuring that the EU regulatory approach for chemicals is based on up-to-date science, the EU can contribute actively to reductions in animal use through a robust implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU – but…

LinkedInX
MF

Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

The Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge welcomes the Commission´s initiative to revise the two main chemical´s regulation in Europe. The European Union has to be a global example of sound chemicals management. The sale of chemicals is estimated to double by 2030, making the proper management of chemicals key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

LinkedInX
E

Eurometaux

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

Eurometaux welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the REACH IIA. Please find attached our comments. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any question. Eurometaux stands ready to contribute with the other stakeholders to ensure REACH delivers it full potential.

LinkedInX
AC

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU)

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

Registration: Quality dossiers are essential to evaluate potential risks and take appropriate regulatory decisions. Requests made by authorities should nevertheless be proportionate and avoid unnecessary burdens. Including information on environmental footprint in registration dossiers could create opportunities to better account for the lifecycle sustainability of substances in regulatory risk management.

LinkedInX
F

FuelsEurope

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

FuelsEurope welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Commission Inception Impact Assessment on the targeted recast of the REACH Regulation. REACH is a comprehensive regulatory framework supported by the most advanced knowledge base at global level.

LinkedInX
EA

EuroWindoor AISBL

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

EuroWindoor appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to the inception impact assessment on the revision of REACH Regulation. The small and medium sized companies of the European window, door and façade sector are downstream users at the end of a long supply chain and far away from the chemical industry.

LinkedInX
PS

PETA Science Consortium International e.v.

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

The PETA Science Consortium International e.V. promotes robust non-animal testing methods that protect human health and the environment. We welcome the opportunity to comment on the consultation ‘Chemicals legislation – revision of REACH Regulation to help achieve a toxic-free environment‘. Please find our response attached.

LinkedInX
C

ClientEarth

· · filed 1 Jun 2021 · source

PDF

A. Context, Problem definition We fully support the analysis of issues related to the knowledge gaps, combination effects, communication in the supply chain, evaluation, and enforcement. However it is both surprising and problematic that the description of the current issues with authorisation does not account for the problems that are the direct consequences of the incorrect interpretation of REACH.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 194 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.