PRODAROM member of IFRA welcomes the opportunity to comment on the EU Commission Inception Impact Assessment on REACH. Full comments are available in the IFRA response. The revision of the REACH regulation should be targeted and science based. The Commission should seek to build on the current solid and existing framework to make it more efficient, consistent and streamlined.
PSN
PRODAROM Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques
Industry association · France
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track PRODAROM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at PRODAROM Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
PRODAROM Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques filed 2 positions between 1 Jun 2021 and 21 Mar 2025, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.
2021 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
Fat on 21 March 2025 * PRODAROM’s reply to the European Commission’s call for contribution for an evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation: PRODAROM, Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques, IFRA member, representing in France the industry of aromatic substances and compositions intended for perfumery, fully supports IFRA’s response to this call for evidence.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put PRODAROM Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 16.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from PRODAROM Syndicat National des Fabricants de Produits Aromatiques’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.