This submission addresses key considerations for the evaluation of the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR), focusing on its effectiveness, relevance, coherence, and EU added value. The revision presents a crucial opportunity to align the regulation with scientific advancements, public expectations, and ethical principles while ensuring consumer and environmental protection. Key Considerations: 1.
ECO
ecopa
NGO · Italy · EU Transparency Register 592558413934-02not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 30 Aug 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track ecopa in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ecopa? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ecopa filed 3 positions between 31 Mar 2022 and 15 Mar 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2022 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
This initiative is positive as having a more efficient harmonization among the EU agencies, with optimization of resources and expertise is important. Just a couple of issues: 1. It is not clear why the fitness check of all chemicals legislation should exclude REACH which is THE chemical legislation by definition 2.
The functioning of the European Chemical Agency is defined in Title II of REACH assigning the duty of “managing and in some cases carrying out the technical, scientific and administrative aspects of this Regulation and to ensure consistency at Community level in relation to these aspects” (Art. 75).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 3 files in common
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 3 files in common
- European Environmental Bureau · 3 files in common
- Eurogroup for Animals · 3 files in common
- The Polish Union of the Cosmetics Industry · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 29.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ecopa’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.