PETA Science Consortium International e.V. (the Science Consortium) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commission (EC) proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices, 2022/123, and 2024/1689.
PETA Science Consortium International e.V.
NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 484576440734-93
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #99 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Stuttgart, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track PETA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at PETA Science Consortium International e.V.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. filed 6 positions between 10 Oct 2022 and 3 Aug 2026, across 6 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
What they argued
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation for the European Commissions initiative 'European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures. In the attached document, we would like to specifically address the questions posed in the call for evidence.
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. ('the Science Consortium') is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the call for evidence for an evaluation of the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR). The evaluation provides a pivotal opportunity to determine if the current implementation of the Regulation aligns with the EUs commitment to phasing out animal testing for chemical safety assessments.
10 October 2022 PETA Science Consortium International e.V. response to the European Commission’s call for evidence on the ‘European Chemicals Agency – proposal for a basic regulation’ PETA Science Consortium International e.V.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the Commissions call for evidence for an evaluation of the European Food Safety Authority (evaluation of performance 2017 2024).
PETA Science Consortium International e.V. (the Science Consortium) is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the draft amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 283/2013 as regards the information to be submitted for active substances.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Humane World for Animals · 4 files in common
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 3 files in common
- Eurogroup for Animals · 3 files in common
- Cruelty Free Europe · 3 files in common
- AESGP · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 28.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from PETA Science Consortium International e.V.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.