NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 6809935493-49
24
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
22
legislative files
of 326 tracked
22
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #8 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
9
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
23
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2008
in the register since
Declares membership of
Eurogroup for Animals is a founding member of the World Federation for Animals which unites the animal protection mov…
https://wfa.org/
Eurogroup for Animals is also a member of Civil Society Europe ehich coordinates civil society groups at EU level.
https://civilsocietyeurope.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Eurogroup for Animals? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Eurogroup for Animals filed 24 positions between 10 Oct 2022 and 31 Jul 2026, across 22 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 22 times.
Eurogroup for Animals’ answer to the EU Public Consultation on a Circular Economy Act While it is urgent to transition to sustainable and circular food systems, insect farming cannot deliver on enhancing circularity in EU agriculture. Authorising waste streams to be channelled to insect farms could threaten the safety of the food chain without sustainability benefits.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the Commissions proposal for a European Biotech Act, considering it a timely opportunity to place human-relevant, non-animal biotechnologies at the centre of the EUs biotechnology strategy. By doing so, the Biotech Act will better align biotechnology policy with European values, scientific excellence, societal expectations and public health priorities.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the European Commissions Biotech Act as a chance to unlock circular, sustainable, and competitive food systems as well as to embed ethical, impactful innovation in EU biotechnology.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the possibility to contribute to the call for evidence on the European Biotech Act II. This initiative provides a valuable occasion to support biotechnologies that can unlock just, circular, sustainable, and competitive food systems and to expand upon the Biotech Act I, the EU Life Sciences Strategy, the EU Roadmap towards phasing out animal testing, as well as other pertinent EU…
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the call for evidence on the European Innovation Act. We strongly encourage the prioritisation of non-animal, biologically-relevant innovations as a central pillar of the EUs innovation agenda.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the European Commissions initiative and urges that the European Strategy on Research and Technology Infrastructures explicitly supports non-animal new approach methodologies (NAMs). To ensure Europes competitiveness and scientific leadership, the strategy should incorporate the following proposals: 1.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes and supports the European Research Area (ERA) Act proposed by the European Commission, which offers an opportunity to foster an innovation-driven and humane research ecosystem as a central pillar of European competitiveness, sustainability, public health and values.
The Vision 2040 for Fisheries and Aquaculture should integrate aquatic animal welfare as a core pillar of a sustainable blue economy, consistent with the Eurogroup for Animals supporting evidence. The framework must reflect strong public expectations and evolving food demand, as 91% of EU citizens support better protection for farmed fish and 70% support stunning before slaughter.
Eurogroup for Animals response to the Commissions public consultation: Nitrates updated rules on the use of certain fertilising materials from livestock manure (RENURE) Relaxed rules on nitrates is a step in the wrong direction - reducing animal numbers and incentivising a dietary shift should be the key priorities The excess of nitrates is linked to high density of farm animals in intensive systems, in combination…
Eurogroup for Animals commends the Commissions initiative to review the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and welcomes the opportunity to contribute to this public consultation. This evaluation is essential for upholding the EUs high safety and ethical standards for cosmetic products.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the EUs framework for national climate targets. It will be important to set national climate targets for agriculture and food. National emissions reduction targets for agriculture will give a clear picture of where the EU is heading in the long term and provide predictability when farmers make investment decisions.
Eurogroup for Animals believes that the EU should use the revision of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as an opportunity to expand its scope to horse meat and introduce specific marketing standards. Such marketing standards would contribute to strengthening intra-EU supply chains against imports from third countries as well as improving consumer protection and food safety.
Eurogroup for Animals (EfA) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to revise the MSFD following its evaluation, emphasizing that aquatic animal welfare must be explicitly recognised as a key component of marine environmental protection.
Eurogroup for Animals, Cruelty Free Europe and the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments welcome the opportunity to share their views on the Commissions proposal to re-attribute scientific and technical tasks and improve cooperation among EU agencies in the area of chemicals.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the European Commissions proposal to modernise the mandate and governance of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). We are pleased to have the opportunity to provide input and would like to take this opportunity to emphasise the need to further strengthen the integration of non-animal approaches within ECHAs mandate, strategic planning, reporting, and operational practices.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes this initiative which aims to align the basic legal provisions establishing ECHA with its future roles. We support actions that can harmonise safety assessments across EU legislation, but this must reflect the EU’s commitment to reduce and replace animal testing for safety and risk assessment, and be based on full exploitation of the toolbox of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs).
For more than four decades, Eurogroup for Animals has brought together animal advocates throughout Europe to significantly enhance the welfare and protection of animals. This proposal for a Regulation on the welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability has been extremely well-received, introducing much-needed measures regarding the traceability of cats and dogs, breeding practices, and imported animals.
CAP 2023-2027 mid-term evaluation: Animal welfare instruments are insufficiently used The contribution focuses on the continued relevance of the CAP in terms of addressing current needs. More than one million citizens have called on the Commission to end the use of cages in animal farming and there is an urgent need to update the animal welfare legislation in line with citizens expectations and scientific evidence.
We at Eurogroup for Animals appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the discussion and evaluation of the EFSA functioning. Please see our feedback below. Enhancing NGO engagement and dialogue within EFSA One of the challenges in our engagement with EFSA has been participating in stakeholder forums that often prioritise information dissemination over actual dialogue.
We support the inclusion of non-penetrative captive bolt stunning, in line with the scientific evidence provided by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which demonstrates that, when applied under appropriate conditions, it can ensure immediate loss of consciousness and, in certain cases, death. We do not support the introduction of nitrogen high-expansion foam (NEFS) for stunning and killing pigs.
Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products in its Recital (68) exposes that: The good manufacturing practice for the purpose of this Regulation should take into account the Union and international standards of animal welfare when active substances are prepared from animals.
Eurogroup for Animals recognises the importance of maintaining local slaughter capacity, particularly where it can contribute to reducing transport times and improving animal welfare before and during slaughter.
Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the European Commission efforts to ensure the availability of local slaughterhouses, particularly where they can contribute to reduced transport distances and the associated welfare risks.
Eurogroup for Animals notes the evaluation assessing the impact of the Economic Partnership Agreement (JEEPA) with Japan after five years of implementation. We hope the findings of this evaluation will help the EU and Japan fully activate the cooperation mechanism on animal welfare, which has yet to be utilised. JEEPA only started to be implemented in 2019, but some effects can already be witnessed.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Eurogroup for Animals’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.