As an environmental scientist I support the goal in the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability to propose new hazard classes and criteria in the CLP regulation. Persistence and mobility should be included as novel hazard classes. Further data availability should be improved to check the compliance and effectiveness of the regulation.
SFI
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag
Academic / research · Switzerland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Swiss in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag filed 2 positions on 1 Jun 2021, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
As an environmental scientist I support the goals of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability to propose new hazard classes and criteria within REACH. Endocrine, disruption, persistence and mobility should be included as novel hazard classes. Further, data availability should be improved to check the compliance and effectiveness of the regulation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 119.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.