As a Polish competent authority for REACH and CLP regulations, we are happy to share the following comments: - We support introducing additional new hazard classes for ED, PBT, vPvB, and PMT, vPvM. However, we believe that the inclusion of such new classes in CLP should be discussed first at the GHS level, to ensure that new criteria can be accepted globally.
BCS
Bureau for Chemical Substances
Public authority · Poland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Bureau in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Bureau for Chemical Substances? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Bureau for Chemical Substances filed 2 positions on 28 May 2021, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
As a Polish competent authority for REACH and CLP regulations, Bureau for Chemical Substances would like to share our concerns and advise against reforming the authorisation process by introducing national authorisation for smaller applications. We believe that such an initiative is likely to negatively impact the functioning of the single market for chemicals in the EU.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Bureau for Chemical Substances next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 119.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Bureau for Chemical Substances’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.