Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FDT

Forbrugerrådet Tænk

Consumer organization · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 39456841401-09

12
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
10
legislative files
of 665 tracked
7
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #107 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

2.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • The Danish Consumer Council is an active member of the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC) and the international…

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Forbrugerrådet Tænk (the Danish Consumer Council)
Head office
København N, Denmark

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Forbrugerrådet in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Forbrugerrådet Tænk

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Forbrugerrådet Tænk? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Forbrugerrådet Tænk filed 12 positions between 1 Sept 2020 and 4 Jun 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 5 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 14 Oct 2025PDFsource

The Danish Consumer Council welcomes this consultation and supports the objective of addressing fragmentation in the EU digital rulebook. However, simplification must not come at a cost to consumers. Instead, it should ensure more effective enforcement. For issues regarding data acquis and simplification of cybersecurity reporting requirements, we refer to BEUCs response to the Digital Omnibus.

Circular Economy Actfiled 6 Nov 2025PDFsource

We welcome the European Commissions ambition to establish a truly strong circular economy. The Commission rightly acknowledges that, despite 15 years of discussions, progress towards this goal has been limited. In our view a consumer-centric framework should aim to create a well-functioning market for long-lived products designed for repair, upgrade, reuse, and refurbishment, supported by accessible infrastructures…

Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesfiled 30 Mar 2023PDFsource

EU Commission proposal for the revision of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008). Overall, the Danish Consumer Council Think welcomes the proposal, in particular the inclusion of endocrine disruptors and the simplification of consumer information. We would like to see mandatory full declaration of chemicals in articles/products on the packaging.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesfiled 1 Jun 2021source

The Danish Consumer Council Think works, inter alia, to ensure that consumers are not exposed to harmful or undesirable chemistry. The Danish Consumer Council Think supports the ambitious EU Chemicals Strategy (CS) and considers that all its objectives must be met. The Danish Consumer Council Think supports the introduction of new hazard classes, e.g.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

Revision of EU legislation on registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicalsfiled 1 Jun 2021source

The Danish Consumer Council Think has been working for years to remove harmful and undesirable chemistry from consumer products. The Danish Consumer Council Think is working to give visibility to the location of the harmful and suspected chemistry and advise consumers to make an informed choice.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

Amending certain Regulations as regards digitalisation and common specifications (Omnibus IV)filed 3 Sept 2025PDFsource

Raising standards for consumers POSITION PAPER ANEC reply to the European Commission proposals on Omnibus Directive and Regulation Aligning product legislation with the digital age Contact: [name removed] [email removed] [name removed] – [email removed] The European Consumer Voice in Standardisation aisbl ANEC is supported financially by the European Union & EFTA Ref: ANEC-WP1-2025-G-051 02/09/2025 Rue d’Arlon 80 –…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

General Product Safety Regulationfiled 4 Oct 2021source

Forbrugerrådet Tænk strongly supports the proposed General Product Safety Regulation. We agree on the specific objectives and welcome: - Value of the safety net function and precautionary principle -Coherent market surveillance rules between harmonised and non-harmonised products as well as the new tools given to Member States -Stronger traceability in the supply chain and a greater responsibility for safety of…

General Product Safety Regulationfiled 1 Sept 2020PDFsource

The Danish Consumer Council strongly supports the announcement of the European Commission to review the General Product Safety Directive. We agree to the problem definition as outlined in the roadmap which emphasises the challenges posed by new technologies, e-commerce and a fragmented legislative framework for market surveillance.

EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulationfiled 1 Nov 2021PDFsource

Forbrugerrådet Tænk welcomes the EC’s inception impact assessment, which contains many points we agree with. We welcome a revision of the Cosmetics directive. We would like to emphasize the need to address combination effects. In line with the CSS new legal provisions which take into account consumers’ combined exposure to ingredients of concern from all sources needs to be introduced.

Amending certain Directives as regards digitalisation and common specifications (Omnibus IV)filed 3 Sept 2025PDFsource

Raising standards for consumers POSITION PAPER ANEC reply to the European Commission proposals on Omnibus Directive and Regulation Aligning product legislation with the digital age Contact: [name removed] [email removed] [name removed] – [email removed] The European Consumer Voice in Standardisation aisbl ANEC is supported financially by the European Union & EFTA Ref: ANEC-WP1-2025-G-051 02/09/2025 Rue d’Arlon 80 –…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Digital labelling of EU fertilising productsfiled 20 Sept 2021source

The Danish Consumer Council thanks the Commission for the opportunity to comment on the Inception Impact Assessment on the simplification and digitalization of labels on chemicals. We believe that consumers need more information, not less. And the consumers need the information at point of sale.

Restriction on CMRs in childcare articlesfiled 4 Jun 2026source

The Danish Consumer Council welcomes the Commission proposal to ban CMR 1A/1B substances in childcare products. Childcare products constitute a significant potential source of children's exposure to CMR substances.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Forbrugerrådet Tænk next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 291.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Forbrugerrådet Tænk’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.