ANCADE welcomes the European Commission's initiative to address the overriding issue of securing the supply of Raw Materials necessary for a green and digital transition. We welcome the proposed Critical Raw Materials Regulation as excellent news, as it is a breakthrough, breaking an insurmountable legislative barrier for MPs and is in line with the fundamental principles of access to resources.
ANCADE
Industry association · Spain · EU Transparency Register 022504216411-22
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1519 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #996 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- European Lime Association (EuLA): www.eula.eu
- International Lime Association (ILA):
- www.internationallime.org
- Industrial Mineral Association (IMA-Europe):
- www. ima-europe.eu
- Confederación de Industrias Extractivas de Rocas y Minerales Industriales (COMINROC): www.cominroc.es
- Confederación Española de las Industrias de las Materias Primas Minerales (PRIMIGEA): www.primigea.es
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- ASOCIACION NACIONAL DE FABRICANTES DE CALES Y DERIVADOS DE ESPAÑA (ANCADE)
- Head office
- MADRID, Spain
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ANCADE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ANCADE? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ANCADE filed 2 positions between 27 May 2021 and 24 May 2023, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The current procedures for registration & authorisation are a heavy burden for EU competitiveness. The current procedures for evaluation of registration dossiers and substances are complex, costly and take too long. The authorisation procedure is too heavy and inflexible. The authorisation process has imposed a heavy burden on both companies and authorities.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ANCADE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 37.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ANCADE’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.