Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SWE

Sweden

Public authority · Sweden

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Sweden in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Sweden? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Sweden engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Sweden or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Sweden filed 2 positions on 31 May 2021, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

What they argued

Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesfiled 31 May 2021PDFsource

Memorandum Ref. Ares(2021)3571203 - 31/05/2021 31 May 2021 M2021/ Ministry of the Environment Swedish comments on the Inception impact assessment for revision of EU legislation on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP) The Swedish Government welcomes the opportunity to comment on the upcoming review on the CLP Regulation.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Sweden next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 119.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Sweden’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.